Tag Archives: dastar

Trademark law and LinkedIn resumes: watch out?

Posted on July 25, 2024 by rtushnet

Portkey Tech. PTE Ltd v. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No. 23-CV-5074 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2024) Another case that starkly shows the effects of trademark’s abandonment of any harm requirement, not to its benefit, where false advertising claims fail because … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Slow fashion: checkerboard design plausibly infringes another checkerboard design

Posted on July 3, 2024 by rtushnet

Hian v. Louis Vuitton USA Inc, 2024 WL 3237591, No. 22-3742 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024) The court tosses out most of an independent fashion designer’s claims against LVMH, while preserving one copyright infringement claim based on a distorted checkerboard … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tiktok’s other, smaller legal problem

Posted on April 29, 2024 by rtushnet

Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co. v. Tiktok Inc., 2024 WL 1772833, No. 23-cv-06012-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024) Skipping the copyright and trade secrets part of the case. (In brief: Meishe argued that Tiktok copied its code via an employee … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Measuring device (c)able under Star Athletica; ignoring Dastar, court also allows false advertising claim

Posted on April 29, 2024 by rtushnet

Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2024 WL 1829620, No. 8-23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024) Leszczynski invented a measuring cube that combines various measuring volumes into a single cubical structure. He posted the Cube design and 3D print files on … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Dastar bars false advertising claim against “first of its kind” ads

Posted on December 15, 2023 by rtushnet

 Vericool World LLC v. Igloo Prods. Corp., 2023 WL 8634803, No. 22-cv-02440-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2023) Vericool alleged that Igloo falsely claimed that its “Recool” biodegradable cooler was the first of its kind. The court found this Dastar-barred, since … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dastar bars false marking claims brought under Lanham Act (dubitante)

Posted on December 7, 2023 by rtushnet

Urban Dollz LLC v. Lashify, Inc., 2023 WL 8292459, No. CV 23-1427-GW-AFMx (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

too much complaining about copying triggers Dastar/preemption for other claims

Posted on November 27, 2023 by rtushnet

Design Gaps, Inc. v. Hall, 2023 WL 8103156, No. 3:23-cv-186-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2023) Design Gaps produces custom cabinetry for high-end homes; Hall is a former employee of Design Gaps who signed a nonsolicitation/noncompete clause but went to work for … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

(c) infringement and false advertising claims against addiction treatment competitor survive, in part

Posted on November 9, 2023 by rtushnet

New Directions Program v. Sierra Health & Wellness Centers LLC, 2023 WL 7284797, No. 2:22-cv-01090-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2023) Plaintiff Gust is the “principal and owner” of plaintiff New Directions and “has been an expert in the field of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

TM co-owner can’t challenge uses authorized by other co-owners (bonus Lexmark reasoning)

Posted on October 24, 2023 by rtushnet

Reed v. Marshall, 2023 WL 6963661, No. H-21-3942 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2023) In 1991, Reed and defendants Marshall and Harris formed the recording group Jade, and in 1992 they signed an exclusive recording agreement with a now-defunct label, Giant. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A&E’s (c) and TM claims survive against former producer’s new version of cop show

Posted on June 26, 2023 by rtushnet

A&E Television Networks, LLC v. Big Fish Entertainment, LLC, 2023 WL 4053871, No. 22 Civ. 7411 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2023) The court refused to dismiss copyright and trademark claims based on copying of a TV show format, including the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment