-
Recent Posts
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
- despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see
- 9th Circuit chips away at consumer protection again
- sitting by designation, Judge Bibas says there’s no de minimis exception to Lanham Act false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: dmca
sending DMCA notices about uncopyrightable work might be willful blindness, or not
Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2025 WL 2551098, No. 8:23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) Previous discussion. I find this case interesting because of the underlying gadget, the Kitchen Cube, which has depressions on different sides corresponding to different standard … Continue reading
allegations of copied instructions lead to finding of noninfringement and possible 512(f) violation
MFB Fertility, Inc. v. Action Care Mobile Veterinary Clinic, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1719347, No. 23 cv 3854 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 22, 2024) MFB sued Action Care for copyright and trademark infringement; Action Care counterclaimed for misrepresentation under … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, defamation, dmca, tortious interference, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Breakout 5 Comparative Approaches
Stefania Fusco (co-author Valerio Sterzi), Does the EU Need an EBay-Like Case? Evidence Against Granting Automatic Injunctions in Europe Patent paper; issues involving NPEs similar to trolling issues in US. If most infringement cases are between noncompetitors, automatic injunction is … Continue reading
New piece: A Hobgoblin Comes for Internet Regulation
My contribution to From the DMCA to the DSA—A Transatlantic Dialogue on Online Platform Regulation and Copyright. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2024/02/new-piece-hobgoblin-comes-for-internet.html
Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 3: Algorithms Liability and Transparency
Chair: Martin Senftleben Impulse Statement: Sebastian Felix Schwemer Recommendation systems; transparency is the approach to recommender systems, which intersects with privacy/data protection. How much can we throw recommendation of information and moderation of information in the same bowl? Algorithmic recommendation/moderation: … Continue reading
27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 4: Industry Perspectives
Moderator: Daphne Keller, Stanford Cyber Policy Center DSA represents a shift to operational mandates compared to DMCA, Art. 17—thoughts? Sabrina Perelman, Pinterest: Important to remember what DSA is and isn’t. We’ve preserved the safe harbor, prohibition against general monitoring. … Continue reading
27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 2: Will the DSA Achieve a “Brussels Effect”?
Moderator: Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Copyright Law and/or/vs. a ‘Brussels Effect’ for the Digital Services Act Jennifer Urban, Berkeley Law School The Brussels Effect claim is descriptive, not predictive—can it apply to the DSA? Criteria favoring a Brussels Effect … Continue reading
DMCA gives Walmart only a gleam of light in sculpture infringement case
Russell v. Walmart Inc., No. CV 19-5495-MWF (JCx), 2020 WL 9073046 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2020) Russell owns registered copyrights in certain photos of sculptures that appeared on Walmart’s marketplace. Previously, the court found that all of Walmart’s affirmative defenses … Continue reading
Section 512 roundtable, open mic
Open mic Janis Pilch, Rutgers U: domestically it seems obvious that litigation on 512 can’t change the systemic problem of infringement and the impossibility for most rightsholders to litigate. 512 sets up a permanent conflict b/t service providers and rightsholders. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, dmca, open mic conferences, secondary liability, Section 512 roundtable
Leave a comment
Comments on DMCA reform
Senator Tillis has been soliciting suggestions for DMCA reform (including 512, 1201, and 1202). With Jessica Litman, Pam Samuelson, and Jennifer Urban, I submitted responses. The Organization for Transformative Works, on whose legal committee I serve, also submitted responses. from … Continue reading →