Tag Archives: false advertising

false advertising is harder to prove than TM infringement because of the injury requirement (not to mention materiality)

ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, INC., 2023 WL 8604148, No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023) The parties are compounding pharmacies that focus on medications used in optometry and ophthalmology. Section 503A compounding pharmacies fill prescriptions for individual patients. Section 503B … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dastar bars false advertising claim against “first of its kind” ads

 Vericool World LLC v. Igloo Prods. Corp., 2023 WL 8634803, No. 22-cv-02440-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2023) Vericool alleged that Igloo falsely claimed that its “Recool” biodegradable cooler was the first of its kind. The court found this Dastar-barred, since … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dastar bars false marking claims brought under Lanham Act (dubitante)

Urban Dollz LLC v. Lashify, Inc., 2023 WL 8292459, No. CV 23-1427-GW-AFMx (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2023) Super-interesting holding that, while there’s no patent field preemption against bringing false patent marking claims under the Lanham Act, Dastar (as expansively interpreted … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

California’s UCL potentially available against junk fees

Sepanossian v. National Ready Mix Co., — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, 2023 WL 7590798, No. B319260 (Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2023) Sepanossian, who operates a construction business, filed a class action against Ready Mix, which sells mixed concrete to small businesses for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Earnings calls, recall notices not “commercial advertising or promotion,” but could be “of and concerning” largest market player

In re SoClean, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liab. Litig., 2023 WL 8006602, MDL No. 3021, No. 22-542 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 17, 2023) Because this is MDL with lots of claims, the facts are a bit complicated. SoClean is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

too much complaining about copying triggers Dastar/preemption for other claims

Design Gaps, Inc. v. Hall, 2023 WL 8103156, No. 3:23-cv-186-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2023) Design Gaps produces custom cabinetry for high-end homes; Hall is a former employee of Design Gaps who signed a nonsolicitation/noncompete clause but went to work for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

who has standing to challenge robot lawyers?

MillerKing, LLC v. DoNotPay, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 3:23-CV-863-NJR, 2023 WL 8108547 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 17, 2023) “This case pits real lawyers against a robot lawyer.” Spoiler: the robot wins for lack of Article III standing. DoNotPay is an … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

when can pharma experts testify about compliance with the FDCA? (also some survey stuff)

ImprimisRX, LLC v. OSRX, Inc., 2023 WL 7390842, No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2023) Imprimis sued defendants, competitors in the compounding pharmacy industry, for false advertising, trademark and copyright infringement, and related claims. It alleged that defendants falsely advertised … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

alleged Haitian corruption doesn’t make collection of “foreign taxes” misleading or material

Celestin v. Martelly, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 6385 (E.D.N.Y. 2023) Plaintiffs alleged Martelly, the then-President-elect of Haiti, devised a “wide-ranging scheme” to impose fees and fix prices on money transfers, food remittances, and international calls made to and from … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

(c) infringement and false advertising claims against addiction treatment competitor survive, in part

New Directions Program v. Sierra Health & Wellness Centers LLC, 2023 WL 7284797, No. 2:22-cv-01090-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2023) Plaintiff Gust is the “principal and owner” of plaintiff New Directions and “has been an expert in the field of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment