-
Recent Posts
- 10th Circuit finds that disparagement by pet food company was commercial speech though affiliated vets’/nonprofits’ speech wasn’t
- safety claims aren’t vague in context of child car seats
- Under Armour defeats Lanham Act claim, must continue to fight tortious interference
- DDC won’t protect World Professional Association for Transgender Health against FTC/WD Tex
- Canadian imported drugs whose origin was disclosed to end consumers couldn’t trigger infringement/false advertising liability
Recent Comments
Archives
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
Brita’s clearly qualified filtration claims couldn’t mislead reasonable consumers as to lack of qualification
Brown v. Brita Products Company, — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 1028347 No. 24-6678 (9th Cir. Apr. 16, 2026) Unlike 800-thread count sheets (see previous post), a reasonable consumer would not expect a fifteen-dollar water filter to “remove or reduce to … Continue reading
an impossible claim is literally false and actionable if believing it is reasonable
Panelli v. Target Corp., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 1042441, No. 24-6640 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2026) Something that I don’t yet have a full handle on is happening in 9th Circuit consumer protection cases around literal falsity v. ambiguity. … Continue reading
FTC mostly succeeds in avoiding dismissal of claims against Uber; states must replead
Federal Trade Comm’n v. Uber Technol., Inc., 2026 WL 976077, No. 25-cv-03477-JST (N.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2026) Since November 2021, Uber has offered a subscription plan called Uber One, typically $9.99 a month or $96 annually with automatic charging and … Continue reading
prefacing statements with “allegedly” or calling them “estimates” doesn’t make them nonfalsifiable opinion
V Shred, LLC v. Kramer, 2026 WL 895614, No. 2:25-cv-01341-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 1, 2026) V Shred is a health and wellness company specializing in “online exercise training programs, exercise apparel, and nutritional supplements.” Kramer is a social media influencer … Continue reading
two cases reach opposite results over whether “health” claims are misleading if products are lead-contaminated
Lopez v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., 2026 WL 788492, No. 24-cv-03573-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026) Lopez alleged that Mead infant formulas’ packaging contains deceptive statements that imply that they are generally nutritious and have “no detrimental, harmful, or genetically … Continue reading
“carbon neutral” not plausibly misleading where D bought offsets from 3d-party certifiers, despite methodological disputes
Bell v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co., 2026 WL 915295, No. 25-cv-04521-TLT (N.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2026) Bell brought the usual California claims based on RJR’s alleged misrepresentation of its products’ carbon neutrality. The court dismissed the complaint. RJR labeled its … Continue reading
Washington Supreme Court rejects private standing for discount misrepresentations
Montes v. Sparc Group LLC, 2026 WL 900481, No. 104162-4, — P.3d —-, 2026 WL 900481 (Wash. Apr. 2, 2026) Interpreting the Washington Consumer Protection Act, the state supreme court held, over a dissent, that buying products that are falsely … Continue reading
Beyond the Dog’s tactics in employment dispute may have been beyond the pale
Beyond The Dog, LLC v. Salzer, 2026 WL 884140, No. 3:24-cv-1439 (VAB) (D. Conn. Mar. 31, 2026) Plaintiffs (BTD) sued defendants Salzer and Canine Behavioral Blueprints, LLC over a failed working relationship, resulting in claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach … Continue reading
naked licensing could constitute false advertising of origin
Epson America, Inc. v. Global Aiptek Inc., 2025 WL 4631973, No. 8:23-cv-00222-FWS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2025) Epson alleged that defendant GAI purposefully and deceptively inflated the lumen and brand specifications of its projectors in violation of the Lanham Act … Continue reading
lack of harm allegations beyond “direct competition plus customer inquiries” insufficient for false advertising standing
Kalmbach Feeds, Inc. v. Purina Animal Nutrition, LLC, 2026 WL 598608, No. 2:25-cv-00617 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 4, 2026) Previously. Kalmbach sued Defendant Purina for false advertising under state and federal law in connection with its Farm to Flock chicken feed, … Continue reading