Tag Archives: false advertising

Cal. anti-SLAPP law protects trailer for show that allegedly promised more fight than it delivered

Camper v. Paramount Global, 2026 WL 836249, No. B339150 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 26, 2026) Camper “viewed a trailer for the reality television show College Hill: Celebrity Edition, which referenced, but did not show, a physical altercation between two cast … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

abortion clinic can proceed with false advertising claims against for-profit ad agency and (in part) the anti-abortion “center” it touted

Four Women Health Servs., LLC v. Abundant Hope Pregnancy Resource Center, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-12283-JEK, 2026 WL 836424 (D. Mass. Mar. 26, 2026) Four Women is a licensed healthcare clinic that provides reproductive healthcare, including abortion care, to its patients. Abundant … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

challenge to whether certification agency did its job can’t be used to disprove an establishment claim

McKeon Rolling Steel Door Co. v. U.S. Smoke & Fire Corp., 2026 WL 865699, 1:23-cv-8720 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026) McKeon sued defendants for false advertising under NY and federal law. I’m ignoring the trade secret counterclaim. McKeon and USS&F … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

court enjoins lawyer from using exaggerated/distorted animation of misfiring gun in advertising

Sig Sauer, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Esq., LLC, No. 3:22-cv-00885 (VAB), 2026 WL 867181 (D. Conn. Mar. 20, 2026) Bagnell, a lawyer, commissioned a graphics company to create an animation purporting to show how a P320 pistol could misfire … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Court enjoins T-Mobile’s “Save over $1000” campaign for comparing apples to oranges

 Cellco Partnership v. T-Mobile USA Inc., 2026 WL 867129, No. 26-cv-0972 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026) Verizon sued T-Mobile for false advertising and the court granted a preliminary injunction, finding that T-Mobile’s claims that switchers could “Save Over $1,000” were … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

“shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing

DeMarco v. DNVB, Inc. (Thursday Boot Co.), No. 25-CV-3076 (GHW) (RFT), 2025 WL 4378637 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2025) (R&R) Thursday Boot sells shoes, apparel, handbags, and accessories on its website, which offers “free shipping and returns in the U. S.” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Deadly automatic litterbox might be falsely advertised as “safe”

Gomez v. PetPivot, Inc., 2026 WL 507708, No. 25-cv-5622 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2026) “Safe” is the kind of word that is general enough that it might be puffery, but courts think that safety is important enough that they sometimes … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amicus in support of cert in Lanham Act intent/damages case

 Truth in Advertising, Barton Beebe, Mark Lemley, Alexandra Roberts and I just filed a brief arguing that the Supreme Court should clarify the role of intent in Lanham Act cases. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2026/02/amicus-in-support-of-cert-in-lanham-act.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Does “Dead Weeds in 1 Day” mean the entire weed will die, or just the visible part?

Scotts Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 2026 WL 482655, No. 2:24-cv-4199 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 20, 2026) Previously, the court rejected Scotts’ request for a preliminary injunction of the trade dress of P&G’s Spruce brand of weed killer products, finding … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

(c) licensor’s claims about competitor’s allegedly worse licenses were opinion, not falsifiable fact

Tresóna Multimedia, LLC v. Pre-Cleared Ltd. D/B/A ClicknClear, 2026 WL 480858, No. 25-cv-6202 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2026) Tresóna, a music copyright licensing entity, sued competitor ClicknClear for NY state and federal false advertising. The court dismissed the claim. Since … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment