-
Recent Posts
- Third Circuit follows Second in protecting medical journals against trade libel claims
- “Safe” not puffery in context of electric dog collars
- Protecting Creativity with a Bottle of Jack on the Floribama Shore (and tiny JDI oral argument observations)
- Another digital “buy” button case survives motion to dismiss
- Supplement guide was plausibly an agent of supplement company; direct and secondary liability available
Recent Comments
Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: part 2 conferences
A Celebration of the Work of Wendy Gordon, part 2
Harmless Free Riding by Wendy Gordon, Boston University School of Law (Additional related drafts from Wendy: Time and Intellectual Property After Coaseand Proximate Cause in the Law of Copyright: Linking Liability to Incentives) Common law imposes penalties on those who harm much more readily than … Continue reading
TMSR, part 2
Session 2: Defining Markets: Doctrinal Settings for Market Analysis in Trademark Law Trademark law clearly already undertakes market definition in the analysis of genericism and also for functionality. Are current approaches adequate? Are markets defined the same way, through the … Continue reading
TM scholars’ roundtable, part 2
Session 1, Cont’d Mid-Point Discussants: Stacey Dogan: pre-20th c, very few cases of claims based on noncompeting goods, and even fewer with actual harm stories. Can be characterized as chance or as the functions of the markets of the day, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged part 2 conferences, TM Scholars' Roundtable, trademark
Leave a comment
Notre Dame Scope Roundtable, part 2
Jeanne Fromer & Mark McKenna, Claiming Design Commentators: Sarah Burstein and Rebecca Tushnet RT: Great paper exploring the ways that different claiming regimes contribute to producers’ ability to maximize rights by claiming under multiple overlapping regimes, copyright, design patent, and … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, design patent, Notre Dame Scope Roundtable, part 2 conferences, trademark
Leave a comment
TM roundtable, part 2
Session 1, cont’d Mid-Point Discussants: Mark Janis: The functionality doctrine is not good at doing the work we’re expecting it to do, both in trade dress and design patents. Recurrent difficulties: tendency for decisionmakers to revert to de facto functionality … Continue reading
Notre Dame Deception Roundtable, part 2
Session 2 – Privacy and Technology Discussion Leaders: Ryan Calo, Aaron Perzanowski, Woody Hartzog, Danielle Citron Matwyshyn: attempts to create commonality/familiarity w/consumer—good feeling. Can also be a part of having ads be artistic expression. Ryan Calo: important role … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged false advertising, ftc, Notre Dame Deception Roundtable, part 2 conferences, privacy
Leave a comment
Trademark Law’s Fundamental Purposes, part 2
The role of justifications and equitable considerations in trademark law: Stacey Dogan Many of the early cases are limiting protection b/c of some interest they’re trying to protect on the other side—Borden is an exception. Maybe a public right … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged part 2 conferences, trademark, Trademark Law's Fundamental Purposes
Leave a comment
ISHTIP at Penn, part 2
Early Career, Panel 2 | Fiona Macmillan (Birkbeck, University of London), Moderator Monica Huerta (Duke University) | Some Singularities, Like the Human Face Famous Sarony photo of Oscar Wilde: signature at bottom is photographer’s. Problem of photographic copyright, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, ISHTIP at Penn, part 2 conferences, trade secrets
Leave a comment