Tag Archives: patent

Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?

Posted on January 30, 2026 by rtushnet

Moderator: Zahr Said, Santa Clara Law Mark Lemley (patent), Stanford Law School After 40 years of radical change, things settled down for normalcy in the last 10 years until Trump. 1980-2017: we grant 350,000 a year up from 50,000; now … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Santa Clara School of Law: Intellectual Property Conference: How It Started, How It’s Going: What Went Right?

Posted on January 30, 2026 by rtushnet

Moderator: Brian Love, Santa Clara Law Jeanne Fromer (trademark), New York University Law School Search and examination on relative grounds (Europe doesn’t do that)—has critiques but generally doing a decent job. Ironic b/c we think of US as “free market” … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

CFP: Yale/Harvard/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum, May 21-22

Posted on January 16, 2026 by rtushnet

 Please share widely!  Request for Submissions Harvard/Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum May 21-22, Yale Law School  Harvard, Stanford, and Yale Law Schools are soliciting submissions for the 2026 Harvard/Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum, to be held at Yale Law School on May … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

bad Lanham Act claim, swept up with bad patent claim, triggers Rule 11 sanctions

Posted on October 30, 2025 by rtushnet

Raydiant Oximetry, Inc. v. ALC Medical Holdings LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 3022882, No. 25-cv-00392-VC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2025) Baseless patent and false advertising claims produce a big Rule 11 award. The patent stuff is eye-popping, and it’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Conspicuous Consumers, NYU Engelberg Center

Posted on October 17, 2025 by rtushnet

Welcome and Keynote: Nancy Mahon, SVP, Global Corporate Citizenship & Sustainability, The Estée Lauder Companies Interesting talk; I learned that UK consumers respond well to claims that a product decreases the company’s carbon footprint, but US consumers aren’t interested in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Closing plenary: DOGE; the First Amendment (me!); and the 50th anniversary of the Copyright Act

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

David Schwartz (Northwestern Pritzker School of Law), Christopher Cotropia (The George Washington University Law School), DOGE Days at the USPTO? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Administrative Reform PTO provides some employees w/union protections and others not. As soon as … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Comparative & International IP

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

Karen Sandrik, Marquette University Law School, Cultural Legacies and Innovation Barriers: Comparative Lessons from Post–Soviet Research Institutions for American Innovation Policy Slovakia: Comenius U press release about first official patent sold/assigned by a Slovak university. They spent a year negotiating … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP: Innovation policy

Posted on February 1, 2025 by rtushnet

Michael Burstein, The Law of the Direction of Innovation Foundational texts: NBER Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, and revisited. But we need to ask: what innovation should we prioritize? What innovation, by whom, and for whom? These are contestable … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

literal falsity might not matter with sufficiently sophisticated customers

Posted on January 10, 2025 by rtushnet

G. W. Aru, LLC v. W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn., No. JKB-22-2636, 2025 WL 45827 (D. Md. Jan. 7, 2025) I’m skipping most of the patent parts, though they are very much present in the case and interact with a … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

false “patented/proprietary/exclusive” claims can be actionable despite Dastar

Posted on October 16, 2024 by rtushnet

Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc., No. 2022-2160 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 3, 2024) Crocs sued competitors for patent infringement; defendant Dawgs counterclaimed for false advertising about the characteristics of the primary material Crocs uses to make its footwear products, a material … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment