-
Recent Posts
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
- Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: remedies
Hetronic remand: the continued rise of “use”
Hetronic International, Inc. v. Hetronic Germany GmbH, — F.4th —-, Nos. 20-6057 & 20-6100, 2024 WL 1724995 (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2024) Hetronic has US registrations; Abitron sold Hetronic-branded products without permission to customers around the world, including in the … Continue reading
Cal. appeals court affirms use of statistical sampling to calculate # of FAL/UCL violations in AG action
People v. Ashford University, LLC, 100 Cal.App.5th 485, 319 Cal.Rptr.3d 132, D080671 (Feb. 20, 2024) Defendants Zovio and Ashfort are the former owners and operators of an online university. The trial court found that for more than a decade, defendants … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, damages, false advertising, remedies
Leave a comment
Nominative fair use requires D to prevail on all 3 factors in 9th Circuit, district court concludes
Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Luxury Home Buyers, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, No.: 2:20-cv-01344-JAD-MDC (D. Nev. Jan. 16, 2024) The court grants plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of parts of this case, discussed previously. Axon alleged that LHB infringed Axon’s “Taser” mark. … Continue reading
“it appears difficult for a defendant, innocent or not, to defend himself in a claim for disgorgement of profits”
Newborn Bros. Co. v. Albion Engineering Co., No. 12-2999, 2024 WL 887785 (D.N.J. Feb. 29, 2024) Previously, after a bench trial, the court found Albion liable for falsely advertising its caulk dispensing guns as “Made in the USA.” Now it’s … Continue reading
Cy pres recipient in false advertising case has to be false-advertising-focused group, court rules
You might think that class action rules can be a bit like Calvinball, and I’d be hard pressed to disagree. Here’s another hurdle to jump, although it’s certainly jumpable. Hawes v. Macy’s Inc., 2023 WL 8811499, No. 1:17-cv-754 (S.D. Ohio … Continue reading
false advertising is harder to prove than TM infringement because of the injury requirement (not to mention materiality)
ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, INC., 2023 WL 8604148, No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2023) The parties are compounding pharmacies that focus on medications used in optometry and ophthalmology. Section 503A compounding pharmacies fill prescriptions for individual patients. Section 503B … Continue reading
Timeshare developer wins disgorgement against timeshare exit marketers despite unclean hands
Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc. v. Timeshare Lawyers P.A., 2023 WL 7109914, No. 20-24681-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2023) Intro: In this trial, the Court has learned that tens of thousands of timeshare owners have been victimized twice: first by the … Continue reading
plaintiff has standing to seek injunctive relief against allegedly falsely advertised penile implant
Peña v. International Medical Devices, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-03391-SSS-PLAx, 2023 WL 5667568 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2023) Plaintiff brought the usual California statutory claims against Penuma, a penile implant/procedure, for alleged misstatements about Penuma’s safety and efficacy. Here, we deal only … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, remedies, standing
Leave a comment
AMG Capital didn’t change monetary remedies for civil contempt
Federal Trade Commission v. National Urological Group, Inc., 2023 WL 5541756 No. 21-14161, — F.4th —- (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2023) Nearly 20 years ago, the FTC sued appellants, alleging they had misrepresented their weight-loss products to consumers. The district … Continue reading
10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. Heartwise, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 4189604, Nos. 20-4126, 21-4152 (10th Cir. Jun. 27, 2023) Proceedings below most recently blogged here. Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for … Continue reading