-
Recent Posts
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
- despite rejecting Lanham Act PI, court enjoins D from making negative statements about P in public if prospective customers might see
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Monthly Archives: April 2025
failure to allege incremental materiality dooms false advertising counterclaims
Intuit Inc. v. HRB Tax Group, Inc., 2025 WL 1168897, No. 5:24-cv-00253-BLF (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2025) Counterclaim-plaintiff (Block) alleged that Intuit engaged in false advertising of its TurboTax services. TurboTax includes three tiers: (1) “Do-It-Yourself;” (2) “Live Assisted;” and … Continue reading
7th Circuit allows nationwide injunction under Illinois consumer protection law
Republic Technol. (NA), LLC v. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 1201401, No. 23-2973, No. 23-3096 (7th Cir. 2025) Republic and BBK (aka HBI) compete in the market for organic hemp rolling papers for cigarettes. Republic … Continue reading
trademark infringement accusations are opinion without a final judgment
Trevari Media, LLC v. Colasse, 758 F.Supp.3d 1175 (C.D. Cal. 2024) Colasse accused Trevari of infringing its trade dress in a “[s]pring-loaded glass-breaking device. Although the trade dress was registered in 2014, when Colasse emailed Trevari alleging infringement in 2021, … Continue reading
package claim that required users to double serving size and add ingredient was plausibly misleading despite disclaimer
Mencia-Montes v. Fit Foods Distrib., Inc., 2025 WL 1185372, No. 24-cv-01768-EKL (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2025) Courts in the 9th Circuit have increasingly held, in consumer protection cases, that an asterisk puts the consumer on notice of important qualifications. But … Continue reading
nonprofits’ promotion of “abortion reversal” services was commercial speech
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Bonta, No. 2:24-CV-08468-HDV-(MARx), 2025 WL 1140450 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2025) Not sure this one survives appellate review, but we’ll see. NIFLA sued for injunctive relief against California AG Bonta over his … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
“defeat devices” in trucks plausibly deceptive because they rendered vehicles unlawful to drive
Biederman v. FCA US LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 458831, No. 23-cv-06640-JSC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2025) This is a putative class action over alleged “defeat devices” in diesel engines installed in RAM 2500 and 3500 pick-up trucks. Plaintiffs … Continue reading
Washington’s anti-spam law covers any misrepresentations in subject line of commercial email
In re Brown v. Old Navy, LLC, 2025 WL 1132243, — P.3d —-, No. 102592-1 (Wash. Apr. 17, 2025) Deciding a certified question, the Washington Supreme Court held over dissent that the state’s anti-spam law covers all commercial emails with … Continue reading
New in my TM collection
Ebay is really great for this sort of thing: Glade Plug-in in the shape of a pine tree See Car-Freshner v. S.C. Johnson & Son, 70 F.3d 267 (2d Cir. 1995). from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/04/new-in-my-tm-collection.html
The Battle for Our Attention: Empirical, Philosophical and Legal Questions: Northeastern University School of Law
Panel 3 – Media and Communication Systems for Attention Capture This panel will address how different fields, from media studies to economics, think about attention, how it is captured and valued. Do different types of media (political news, advertisements, sexual … Continue reading
trademark use is easier with a suggestive mark than with a descriptive one
Medical Depot, Inc. v. Med Way US, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 948334, No. 22-CV-01272 (OEM) (SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 20 This case focuses on trademark “use.” The parties are medical supply companies who use similar marks—“Med-Aire” and “MEDAIR®”—to … Continue reading