Author Archives: rtushnet

11th Circuit protects (at least some) truthful references to product creation

Webster v. Dean Guitars, — F.3d —-, 2020 WL 1887783, No. 19-10013 (11th Cir. Apr. 16, 2020) Buddy Webster (pka Buddy Blaze), a successful guitar maker and technician, in the mid-1980s modified a Dean guitar and commissioned someone to paint … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

reasonable consumers wouldn’t think Dunkin Donuts Angus Steak was intact piece of meat

Chen v. Dunkin’ Brands, Inc., No. 18-3087-cv, — F.3d —-, 2020 WL 1522826 (2d Cir. Mar. 31, 2020) Plaintiffs sued Dunkin for deceptively marketing the Angus Steak & Egg Breakfast Sandwich and the Angus Steak & Egg Wake-Up Wrap, alleging … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

1201 claim to control device features survives

Philips North America, LLC v. v. Summit Imaging Inc., 2020 WL 1515624, No. C19-1745JLR (W.D. Wash. Mar. 30, 2020) But I was told that after Lexmark and Chamberlain, manufacturers weren’t using §1201 claims to control devices! The parties compete to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Humvees in Call of Duty are constitutionally protected realism, not confusing/diluting

AM General LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 8644 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2020) The district court allows Humvees to appear in realistic videogames by performing a full confusion analysis, despite purporting to follow Rogers v. Grimaldi. The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Rogers continues to collapse into transformativeness in the Ninth Circuit: dog toy edition

VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., No. 18-16012 (9th Cir. Mar. 21, 2020) VIP Products sells the “Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker” dog toy, which resembles a bottle of Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7 Black Label Tennessee Whiskey, but … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

lawsuit against supplement for implying arthritis claims not preempted

Yamagata v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, 2020 WL 1505724, No. 17-cv-03529-VC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2020) A very clear opinion. Yamagata challenged RB’s advertising for joint supplements under California and NY law. As the court explained: “If the boxes are best understood … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

T-Mobile is plausibly liable for acts of explicitly authorized dealers

City of New York v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 2020 WL 1498522, No. 451540/2019 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Mar. 23, 2020) The City of New York and the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) sued T-Mobile, its subsidiary MetroPCS New … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A blueberry bagel that is mostly imitation blueberry is plausibly misleading

Izquierdo v. Panera Bread Co., No. 18-CV-12127 (VSB), 2020 WL 1503557 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) Panera sold a “blueberry bagel” that allegedly wasn’t.  [My father thinks that bagels with fruit etc. in them already aren’t bagels, but the allegation here … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TheRealReal is ok except where it is FakeFake

Chanel, Inc. v. The RealReal, Inc., 2020 WL 1503422, No. 18-CV-10626 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020) Very interesting case: Chanel sued TRR for trademark infringement etc. for allegedly overclaiming its association with Chanel by prominently advertising how much Chanel there … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

grey goods: materiality is key

Dentsply Sirona, Inc. v. Dental Brands For Less LLC, No. 15 Civ. 8775 (LGS), 2020 WL 1643891 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2020) Trademark confusion is sometimes a normative conclusion, not an empirical one, even though the language surrounding it is empirical. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment