-
Recent Posts
- it’s hard to get rid of a foreign TM owner’s complaint at the motion to dismiss stage despite territoriality
- dct strikes down California’s new recyclability law on vagueness/1A grounds
- look, there’s a lawsuit: bad claim against comedian leads to anti-SLAPP award
- 5th Circuit puts its own spin on the server test
- weak infringement case + bad litigation conduct = fee shift for anticompetitive suit over descriptive term
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Author Archives: rtushnet
abortion clinic can proceed with false advertising claims against for-profit ad agency and (in part) the anti-abortion “center” it touted
Four Women Health Servs., LLC v. Abundant Hope Pregnancy Resource Center, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-12283-JEK, 2026 WL 836424 (D. Mass. Mar. 26, 2026) Four Women is a licensed healthcare clinic that provides reproductive healthcare, including abortion care, to its patients. Abundant … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
challenge to whether certification agency did its job can’t be used to disprove an establishment claim
McKeon Rolling Steel Door Co. v. U.S. Smoke & Fire Corp., 2026 WL 865699, 1:23-cv-8720 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026) McKeon sued defendants for false advertising under NY and federal law. I’m ignoring the trade secret counterclaim. McKeon and USS&F … Continue reading
court enjoins lawyer from using exaggerated/distorted animation of misfiring gun in advertising
Sig Sauer, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Bagnell, Esq., LLC, No. 3:22-cv-00885 (VAB), 2026 WL 867181 (D. Conn. Mar. 20, 2026) Bagnell, a lawyer, commissioned a graphics company to create an animation purporting to show how a P320 pistol could misfire … Continue reading
Court enjoins T-Mobile’s “Save over $1000” campaign for comparing apples to oranges
Cellco Partnership v. T-Mobile USA Inc., 2026 WL 867129, No. 26-cv-0972 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026) Verizon sued T-Mobile for false advertising and the court granted a preliminary injunction, finding that T-Mobile’s claims that switchers could “Save Over $1,000” were … Continue reading
WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
A Pantone Prerogative: Defining the Privilege to Standardize Color (Felicia Caponigri) Color standards have been around for a long time. Pantone developed standards and uses its system to promote the colors; registration for the matching system and the color chip. … Continue reading
WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
The Arbitrary Myth (Dustin Marlan) Connecting the Abercrombie critique literature w/some of the critical/cultural appropriation theory. Judge Friendly says: it need hardly be added that fanciful and arbitrary terms enjoy the protection accorded to suggestive terms. Catachresis: strained metaphor—arbitrary marks … Continue reading
WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
The European Accent of U.S. Digital Platform Speech (Brian Downing) We are often told that self-governance by corporate platforms is better than government control, but his experience was that freedom of action wasn’t free. US gov’t defers to platforms, but … Continue reading
“shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
DeMarco v. DNVB, Inc. (Thursday Boot Co.), No. 25-CV-3076 (GHW) (RFT), 2025 WL 4378637 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2025) (R&R) Thursday Boot sells shoes, apparel, handbags, and accessories on its website, which offers “free shipping and returns in the U. S.” … Continue reading
WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
A Digital Right of Publicity for the AI World (Emma Perot) Prehistory: ROP covers lookalikes, soundalikes, video game avatars (at least for realism). Persona as training data. Theories of personality: users informed about use; many social media companies do not … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
WIPIP Panel 2: Copyright and Culture
Copyright’s Invisible Hand: Subsidizing America’s Cultural Institutions (Guy Rub) © sometimes requires payment from more intensive users, sometimes not. Exclusive rights: unbundling—buy a book to read v. buy a book to adapt to movie. Fair use is sometimes bundling: … Continue reading