-
Recent Posts
- State barber board wins battle against “Barber Shop” bar
- compounding pharmacies lose a round with Lilly on personalized medicine and GLP-1 comparison claims
- Bayer can’t enjoin J&J’s cancer superiority claims by showing methodological disputes
- “higher standard of safety” is puffery even as to child car seats
- phthalates could be “ingredient” for purposes of falsifying “only natural ingredients”
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Author Archives: rtushnet
False advertising and the privatized state
Hansen v. Scram of California, Inc., No. 17-cv-01474, 2017 WL 1628401 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2017) When the carceral state becomes a business, can it commit business torts? Plaintiffs sued Scram and Alcohol Monitoring Systems (AMS) for the usual statutory … Continue reading
City of Chicago can sue pharmacos for falsely advertising opiods
City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 211 F.Supp.3d 1058 (N.D. Ill. 2016) The court sustained in part a claim by Chicago against defendant pharmacos, based on their allegedly deceptive and unfair marketing campaigns that served to “reverse[] the medical … Continue reading
court allows company to bring right of publicity claim
Youngevity Int’l, Corp. v. Smith, No. 16-cv-00704, 2016 WL 7626584 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2016) Youngevity and Dr. Joel D. Wallach sell various health supplements using independent direct sellers known as “distributors” to move product. The individual defendants were former … Continue reading
Illinois right of publicity allows truthful statements about performers in ads
Martin v. Wendy’s International, Inc., No. 15 C 6998 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 28, 2017) Discussion of the initial dismissal here. The revised complaint fares no better. Martin holds the world record for consecutive kicks of a footbag, which was mentioned … Continue reading
What does a counterfeit look like?
Coach, Inc. v. Chung Mei Wholesale, Inc., 2016 WL 7470001, No. 15-22829 (S.D. Fla. Jul. 17, 2016) Interesting case involving alleged counterfeiting of Coach products. The defendants ran a business importing goods from China and selling them to retailers and … Continue reading
Lost sales as irreparable harm
Epson America, Inc. v. USA111, Inc., No. 17-cv-00129, 2017 WL 1484400 (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 2017) Let’s admit it: the case law is a mess on this. Epson sued its competitor, d/b/a iRULU, for falsely advertising its portable consumer projectors, specifically … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Lost sales as irreparable harm false advertising, remedies
Leave a comment
split panel upholds Berkeley cell disclosure law
CTIA-The Wireless Ass’n v. City of Berkeley, No. 16-15141 (9th Cir. Apr. 21, 2017) A City of Berkeley ordinance requires cell phone retailers to inform prospective cell phone purchasers that carrying a cell phone in certain ways may cause them … Continue reading
“tests prove X” claim can’t be falsified by showing not-X, court (wrongly) rules
Dyson, Inc. v. SharkNinja Operating LLC, No. 14-cv-09442 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 26, 2017) Dyson and Shark compete in the market for vacuum cleaners. When Shark began running an infomercial for its competing vacuum in September 2014, Dyson’s margin on its … Continue reading
US companies can be enjoined from false advertising in China
Primo Broodstock, Inc. v. American Mariculture, Inc., No. 17-cv-9, 2017 WL 1502714 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 27, 2017) Primo is a Texas corporation that breeds and sells “highly disease-resistant” shrimp from the Ecuadorian litopenaeus vannamei strain. Defendant Robin Pearl has an … Continue reading
Internet surveys are admissible (but may raise IRB concerns)
Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Sycamore, No. 13-cv-00749, 2017 WL 1377991 (D. Utah Mar. 2, 2017) Bimbo charged that defendants misappropriated its trade secret for making Grandma Sycamore’s Home-Maid bread, and infringed on its trade dress related to the packaging … Continue reading