-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Author Archives: rtushnet
IPSC session 2 copyright/trademark
Copyrightable Subject Matter Kevin Collins, Copyright in Suburbia (Collins is a registered architect as well as a law prof) The stakes: whether © is “working” in suburbia matters in ways that might not be self-evident. Snack box approach: scattered observations … Continue reading
IPSC: IP in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court and some TM
Mark Bartholomew, Publicity Rights After Warhol Risk that courts will apply Warhol to ROP cases, but transformativeness is the only element in the ROP defense as defined by the California SCt rather than a multifactor fair use test. This could … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Opening Plenary Session
IP Outside the (Doctrinal) Box Andrew Gilden: Love & Hate in IP IP’s struggles with joy, pleasure, and fun—happens with sex, but also with enjoyment. Courts are pretty openly hostile to statements by Ds that they enjoyed engaging in the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, consumer protection, copyright, first amendment, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
“fair and skill-based” may falsely imply absence of bots in online gaming
Skillz Platform Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., 2024 WL 3526853, No. 24cvl646(DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2024) Skillz sued its competitor in mobile gaming, Papaya, for violating federal and NY law against false advertising by falsely advertising that its games pit … Continue reading
“Pure Irish Butter” plausibly misleads as to absence of dangerous chemicals
Winans v. Ornua Foods North America Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1741079, No. 2:23-cv-01198-FB-RML (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that the presence of per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (“PFAS”) in Kerrygold butter made the use of “pure Irish butter” … Continue reading
No copyright over simple colors and shapes used to annotate X-rays
Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc., 2024 WL 3480212, No. 24-cv-10446-ADB (D. Mass. Jul. 19, 2024) The court denied Overjet’s request for a preliminary injunction on copyright and false advertising claims, concluding that Overjet’s selection of colors and shapes for annotating … Continue reading
Trademark law and LinkedIn resumes: watch out?
Portkey Tech. PTE Ltd v. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No. 23-CV-5074 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2024) Another case that starkly shows the effects of trademark’s abandonment of any harm requirement, not to its benefit, where false advertising claims fail because … Continue reading
Announcing the Seventh Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law Casebook by Goldman & Tushnet
Eric Goldman and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. It is available for purchase in the following formats: * DRM-free PDF file. Price: $12* Kindle. Price: $9.99* Print-on-demand paperback from Amazon. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged advertising, false advertising, my writings, teaching
Leave a comment
“plant-based” is plausibly misleading without qualification; can asterisks save the day?
Whiteside v. Kimberly Clark Corp., No. 23-55581, 2024 WL 3435308, — F.4th — (9th Cir. Jul. 17, 2024) Whiteside alleged that KC’s “plant-based” baby wipes were misleadingly advertised; the court of appeals revived some claims that the district court had … Continue reading
Plaintiffs win partial summary judgment on falsity/materiality in “made in US” tea case
Banks v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-06208-DDP-RAOx, 2024 WL 3330554 (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2024) The court here grants the consumer plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their theory of falsity of Bigelow’s “manufactured in the USA” claim for … Continue reading