Author Archives: rtushnet

IPSC session 2 copyright/trademark

Copyrightable Subject Matter Kevin Collins, Copyright in Suburbia (Collins is a registered architect as well as a law prof) The stakes: whether © is “working” in suburbia matters in ways that might not be self-evident. Snack box approach: scattered observations … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: IP in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court and some TM

Mark Bartholomew, Publicity Rights After Warhol Risk that courts will apply Warhol to ROP cases, but transformativeness is the only element in the ROP defense as defined by the California SCt rather than a multifactor fair use test. This could … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

IP Outside the (Doctrinal) Box Andrew Gilden: Love & Hate in IP IP’s struggles with joy, pleasure, and fun—happens with sex, but also with enjoyment. Courts are pretty openly hostile to statements by Ds that they enjoyed engaging in the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“fair and skill-based” may falsely imply absence of bots in online gaming

Skillz Platform Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., 2024 WL 3526853, No. 24cvl646(DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2024) Skillz sued its competitor in mobile gaming, Papaya, for violating federal and NY law against false advertising by falsely advertising that its games pit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Pure Irish Butter” plausibly misleads as to absence of dangerous chemicals

Winans v. Ornua Foods North America Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1741079, No. 2:23-cv-01198-FB-RML (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that the presence of per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (“PFAS”) in Kerrygold butter made the use of “pure Irish butter” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

No copyright over simple colors and shapes used to annotate X-rays

Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc., 2024 WL 3480212, No. 24-cv-10446-ADB (D. Mass. Jul. 19, 2024) The court denied Overjet’s request for a preliminary injunction on copyright and false advertising claims, concluding that Overjet’s selection of colors and shapes for annotating … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Trademark law and LinkedIn resumes: watch out?

Portkey Tech. PTE Ltd v. Venkateswaran, 2024 WL 3487735, No. 23-CV-5074 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2024) Another case that starkly shows the effects of trademark’s abandonment of any harm requirement, not to its benefit, where false advertising claims fail because … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Announcing the Seventh Edition of Advertising & Marketing Law Casebook by Goldman & Tushnet

Eric Goldman and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. It is available for purchase in the following formats: * DRM-free PDF file. Price: $12* Kindle. Price: $9.99* Print-on-demand paperback from Amazon. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“plant-based” is plausibly misleading without qualification; can asterisks save the day?

Whiteside v. Kimberly Clark Corp., No. 23-55581, 2024 WL 3435308, — F.4th — (9th Cir. Jul. 17, 2024) Whiteside alleged that KC’s “plant-based” baby wipes were misleadingly advertised; the court of appeals revived some claims that the district court had … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Plaintiffs win partial summary judgment on falsity/materiality in “made in US” tea case

Banks v. R.C. Bigelow, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-06208-DDP-RAOx, 2024 WL 3330554 (C.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2024) The court here grants the consumer plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on their theory of falsity of Bigelow’s “manufactured in the USA” claim for … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment