-
Recent Posts
- Amicus in section 230 false light case
- Amicus in Rise & Shine
- it’s hard to get rid of a foreign TM owner’s complaint at the motion to dismiss stage despite territoriality
- dct strikes down California’s new recyclability law on vagueness/1A grounds
- look, there’s a lawsuit: bad claim against comedian leads to anti-SLAPP award
Recent Comments
Archives
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Author Archives: rtushnet
Found on road deceptive: “track car” claim plausibly misleading
Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Co., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 2700347, No. 17-21087-CIV-MORENO (S.D. Fla. Jul. 1, 2021) In this multistate class action based on purchases of the Shelby GT350 Mustang, the court granted Ford summary judgment on some claims … Continue reading
Rogers v Grimaldi doesn’t apply to alcohol, but Peaky Blinders still can’t get injunction
Caryn Mandabach Prods. Ltd. v. Sadlers Brewhouse Ltd., 2021 WL 2497928, No. CV 20-10220-CBM-(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. May 19, 2021) Mandabach produces the TV series Peaky Blinders, and it alleged that it owned trademarks and other intellectual property of the show … Continue reading
Renting legitimate goods isn’t actionable, at least with disclaimer
Proactive Environmental Products Int’l, LLC v. Pine Environmental Servs., LLC, No. 8:21-cv-250-CEH-CPT, 2021 WL 3025481 (M.D. Fla. May 20, 2021) (R&R) Proactive alleged that Pine infringed registered trademarks associated with Proactive’s groundwater sampling pumps and their components and engaged in … Continue reading
innovative/”new technology” claims foiled by Dastar
Powerbahn, LLC v. Foundation Fitness LLC, 2021 WL 2689852, No. 1:19-cv-1678-AT (N.D. Ga. Ma.r 26, 2021) POWERbahn alleged that defendant Wahoo made false representations in its ads by failing to disclose POWERbahn and its CEO as the source of the … Continue reading
Robinhood’s newsletter isn’t commercial advertising
Jackson v. Robinhood Markets, Inc., 2021 WL 2435307, No. 21-cv-02304-LB (N.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021) Jackson, known professionally as Ice Cube, sued after Robinhood used his image and a paraphrase of a line from his song “Check Yo Self” to … Continue reading
“Oregon” wine bottled in California might be confusing
Kay v. Copper Cane, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 2953241, No. 20-cv-04068-RS (N.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021) Plaintiffs challenged the labels on a line of CC’s pinot noirs, alleging deception about the wine’s appellation of origin in Oregon generally … Continue reading
Rejected compliance offer to AG leads to fee shift after defense victory
State ex rel. Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC, 313 Or.App. 176, A163980 — P.3d —-, 2021 WL 2946172 (Jul. 14, 2021) The state alleged that LE falsely advertised its 5-hour Energy drinks, misrepresenting (1) the effects of the noncaffeine ingredients … Continue reading
Pom Wonderful applies to pharmaceuticals, but “implied FDA approval” claim still fails
Belcher Pharms., LLC v. Hospira, Inc., 1 F.4th 1374 (11th Cir. 2021) Belcher alleged that the labels for two of Hospira’s drugs falsely implied that the products and their uses were FDA-approved. The district court rejected that claim on the … Continue reading
FTC fails to show lack of substantiation because court reads ASTM standards as nonrestrictive
Federal Trade Comm’n v. Innovative Designs, Inc., 2021 WL 3086188, — Fed.Appx. —-, No. 20-3379 (3d Cir. Jul. 22, 2021) Another FTC loss, this time for failing to prove that IDI’s claims about its Insultext House Wrap were false or … Continue reading
Duelling results in Mexican origin cases
Rodriguez v. Olé Mexican Foods Inc., 2021 WL 1731604, No. EDCV 20-2324 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2021) Rodriguez alleged that Olé’s La Banderita tortillas falsely advertised Mexican origin based on a Mexican flag front and center on the … Continue reading