-
Recent Posts
- False endorsement claim can proceed against gov’t issued license plates and gov’t facility named for Roberto Clemente
- Non-TM owner can use 43(a) to challenge confusing use
- 11th Circuit affirms defense TM verdict; evidence of confusion is not evidence of harm for disgorgement
- CFP: Yale/Harvard/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum, May 21-22
- court rejects TM owner’s attempt to require full chain of custody for first sale defense, but where is the burden of proof?
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
False endorsement claim can proceed against gov’t issued license plates and gov’t facility named for Roberto Clemente
Clemente Properties, Inc. v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 125574, No. 23-1922 (1st Cir. Jan. 16, 2026) The representatives of the family of a famous deceased Puerto Rico baseball player, Roberto Clemente, sued the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, false endorsement, trademark
Leave a comment
Non-TM owner can use 43(a) to challenge confusing use
Postar v. Hyland, 2026 WL 145934, No. 5:24-CV-019-H (N.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2026) This case allows a non-TM owner to bring a false advertising/unfair competition claim over allegedly confusing use of a trademark, and I think it’s right to do … Continue reading
11th Circuit affirms defense TM verdict; evidence of confusion is not evidence of harm for disgorgement
Florida Virtual School v. K12, Inc., 2026 WL 127063, No. 24-10449 (11th Cir. Jan. 15, 2026) A pretty good example of why granting registrations to highly descriptive (at best) terms is a bad idea! Also a good example of why … Continue reading
CFP: Yale/Harvard/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum, May 21-22
Please share widely! Request for Submissions Harvard/Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum May 21-22, Yale Law School Harvard, Stanford, and Yale Law Schools are soliciting submissions for the 2026 Harvard/Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum, to be held at Yale Law School on May … Continue reading
court rejects TM owner’s attempt to require full chain of custody for first sale defense, but where is the burden of proof?
ZAGG Inc. v. Ichilevici, 2026 WL 63142, No. 23-cv-20304-ALTMAN/Reid (S.D. Fla. Jan. 8, 2026) ZAGG sells a variety of screen protectors, power management solutions, mobile keyboards, cases, and personal audio products, including my beloved Mophie. Defendant DVG resells products, including … Continue reading
Temu’s “cheaper and way better quality than Shein” claims were potentially falsifiable, not puffery
Roadget Business PTE. Ltd. v. PDD Holdings Inc., 2026 WL 44864, No. 24-2402 (TJK) (D.D.C. Jan. 7, 2026) Plaintiff, aka Shein, sells low-priced fashion and lifestyle products through a website and mobile application. Defendant runs a competing, discount-driven online platform—Temu. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged dilution, disparagement, false advertising, trademark
Leave a comment
Dueling geneologists: photo (c) claims allowed, but not Lanham Act or factual compilation claims
Hein v. Mai, 2026 WL 44798, No. 24-01126-JWB (D. Kan. Jan. 7, 2026) Some interesting stuff going on in the genealogy world! The Volga German people are individuals of German origin who moved to the Volga region of Russia in … Continue reading
false advertising’s injury requirement causes reverse passing off claim to fail
Kesters Merchandising Display International, Inc. v. SurfaceQuest, Inc., — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 35198, No. 24-3112 (10th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026) SurfaceQuest allegedly marketed its products with photographs of its competitor Kesters’ competing product. Kesters sells “a lightweight, seamless material … Continue reading
laches, once established, bars Lanham Act claims even during more recent periods
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Distinctive Design & Construction LLC, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 3492373, No. 24-1860 (Dec. 5, 2025) Super complicated facts; I’ll try to focus on the Lanham Act laches part because of that. “[A]fter a squabble developed … Continue reading
what particularity is required when an ad campaign has zillions of possibly algorithmic variants?
Ledesma v. Hismile, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 3785960, No. 24-cv-03626-KAW (N.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2025) Blogging because it’s one of the first cases I’ve seen that has to address questions raised by algorithmically modified ads that are different … Continue reading