Category Archives: Uncategorized

FDCA doesn’t preclude lawsuit based on allegedly false claims about compounding drugs

Pacira Biosciences, Inc. v. Nephron Sterile Compounding Center, LLC, No. 3:23-5552-CMC, 2024 WL 3656489 (D.S.C. Jul. 15, 2024) Pacira, which sells non-opioid pain management products, including Exparel, sued Nephron for false advertising. Exparel is “bupivacaine suspended in multivesicular liposomes,” and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Lanham Act unclean hands defenses are hard to win

World Nutrition Inc. v. Advanced Enzymes USA, No. CV-19-00265-PHX-GMS, 2024 WL 3665360 (D. Ariz. Aug. 6, 2024) The parties—here WNI and AST—sell enzyme supplements and sued each other under the Lanham Act, and both prevailed on their affirmative claims and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Court accepts survey with disclaimer control that causes 38% confusion

 Another ruling in the PNC v. Plaid case: PNC Financial Services Gp. v. Plaid Inc., 2024 WL 3691607, No. 2:20-cv-1977 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2024) Daubert motions for this case. I’ll only discuss the stuff I find interesting.   Kivetz … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Plaid must face jury on PNC’s TM/advertising claims, but has good laches/acquiescence argument

PNC Financial Services Gp. v. Plaid Inc., 2024 WL 3687956, No. 2:20-cv-1977 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2024) PNC is “a large, diversified financial institution offering retail and wholesale banking services,” while Plaid connects cash payment and investment account applications like … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Punchbowl, punchback: district court finds confusion unlikely between invitation and political news sites

Punchbowl, Inc. v. AJ Press LLC, 2:21-cv-03010-SVW-MAR (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2024) Punchbowl home page Punchbowl News home page On remand from the 9th Circuit, the court conducts a multifactor likely confusion analysis and finds that Punchbowl’s digital invitation services … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Trademark question of the day

 Spotted around town: For reference, here’s the Grand Theft Auto font: from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2024/08/trademark-question-of-day.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

State Little FTC Acts still have teeth, as Georgia’s proves

Federal Trade Commission v. Peyroux, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1283344, No. 1:21-cv-3329-AT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 11, 2024) The FTC and the state of Georgia sued three corporate defendants and two individual defendants, Peyroux and Detelich. The underlying acts carried … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Grubhub’s listing of unaffiliated restaurants on its platform could infringe TM

Lynn Scott, LLC v. Grubhub Inc., 2024 WL 3673718, No. 20 C 6334 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 6, 2024) Restaurants brought a putative class action alleging that Grubhub used their names and logos confusingly, asserting claims under the Lanham Act. “Grubhub … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC Closing Plenary: Fair Use After Warhol

Christopher Buccafusco, Copyrighting Style There are plenty of precedents that say style isn’t ©able. Appropriating the “core” of a work is not infringing in the absence of substantial similarity.there are also cases suggesting ©ability of style: Steinberg, saying style is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 5 Comparative Approaches

Stefania Fusco (co-author Valerio Sterzi), Does the EU Need an EBay-Like Case? Evidence Against Granting Automatic Injunctions in Europe Patent paper; issues involving NPEs similar to trolling issues in US. If most infringement cases are between noncompetitors, automatic injunction is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment