-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Hall v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 19cv1715-JO-AHG, 2023 WL 4417265, — F.R.D. – (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2023) Previous opinion in this case about allegedly deceptive/inadequately disclosed mandatory “resort fees.” The court ends up certifying an issues California class, but … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
IPSC Closing Plenary Session
An Author/Reader Conversation about Jessica Silbey, Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Internet Age (2022) Robert Brauneis: Three layers—(1) object of discovery: creator and innovator accounts, concerns, what kind of conditions support/hinder them in their work; (2) … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, patent, trade secrets, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Breakout Session #5 Platforms & Interfaces/IP Enforcement
Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Tech Bros, Social Media, and the End of IP Financing? Ideas are nothing without financing. Banks will not give loans secured by patents; banking law constraints. How was Silicon Valley Bank able to make loans to startups before … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session #4 Innovation/Copyright
Room 204 Christopher Buccafusco (w/ Joseph Blocher), Firearms, Innovation, and Regulation How do law and markets affect the pace and direction of innovation for firearm related safety in the US? Costly inefficiencies in supply and demand. Virtually no one thinks … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session #3: Distributive Effects/Art and Music
Bita Amani, Some More Equal Than Others: Critical Contexts for the (False) Promises of Intellectual Property Rights IP and sustainable development goals: What is equality itself? Often formal equality is presented in the pretext of equal application … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session #2: mostly copyright and then marijuana innovation
Michael Carroll (w/ Peter Jaszi), Fair Use After Google and Warhol Codification is a big deal; clarifies that fair use is a distinct doctrine, whereas well into 20th century courts were using it as noninfringement. Courts weren’t using four factors … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session #1
Too much to choose from; I prioritized things that were new to me. Mark Bartholomew, A Right to Be Left Dead If we can create new works in a dead author’s style after they’re gone and create conversations with them … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Opening Plenary Session
Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Non expressive uses: … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 230, conferences, consumer protection, copyright, false advertising, first amendment, patents, trademark
Leave a comment
poop bag seller’s “compostable” claims are plausibly … false
Natale v. 9199-4467 Quebec Inc., 2023 WL 4850531, No. 21-CV-6775 (JS)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2023) Many lawsuits against “recyclable” claims have been dismissed, but not this “compostable” one. Defendant sells “Earth Rated Certified Compostable Poop Bags.” “On the packaging [of] … Continue reading
allowing free “For Sale By Owner” ads doesn’t imply no agents will be involved
Picket Fence Preview, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., 2023 WL 4852971, No. 22-2066-cv (2d Cir. Jul. 31, 2023) District court opinion discussed (second) here. The district court dismissed Picket Fence’s false advertising/unfair competition claims against Zillow under the Vermont Consumer Protection … Continue reading