-
Recent Posts
- Elsevier’s “peer review” claims are commercial advertising, but not shown false or connected to P’s harm
- Quince quashes consumer suit; reasonable consumers must scroll a bit to understand comparison to “traditional retail”
- Google gets 230 protection for fraudulent apps in Google Play
- court refuses to recognize Lanham Act false advertising contributory liability
- Kalshi’s gambling services aren’t so clearly illegal as to make its offerings false advertising
Recent Comments
Archives
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Reminder on Call for Papers: Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable 2024
The Trademark and Unfair Competition Scholarship Roundtable co-hosted by Harvard, NYU, and the University of Pennsylvania will take place this year at Harvard. The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, false advertising, and … Continue reading
court remands NYC’s false advertising case against oil companies to state court
City of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2024 WL 2091994, No. 21-CV-4807 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. May 8, 2024) Being a multitrillion-dollar corporation means you can survive a “ridiculous” argument or two. Here, the city successfully wins remand (and a fee … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, first amendment
Leave a comment
reasonable consumers of ovulation test kits understand details of hormone signalling
La Rosa v. Abbott Laboratories, No. 22-CV-5435 (RER) (JRC), 2024 WL 2022297 (E.D.N.Y. May 7, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that defendants’ at-home ovulation test kits were deceptive because they advertised “ovulation test kits” alongside the front-of-package statement “99% ACCURATE,” which conveyed … Continue reading
online ingredients list can’t avoid deception claim, at least where survey suggests deception
Duncan v. Kahala Franchising, L.L.C., — F.Supp.3d —-, CV 22-7841 (GRB)(AYS), 2024 WL 1936053 (E.D.N.Y. May 2, 2024) Lots of ice cream jokes/quotes in here, but the basic question is: “should consumers ordering pistachio ice cream at one of [Cold … Continue reading
Tiktok’s other, smaller legal problem
Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co. v. Tiktok Inc., 2024 WL 1772833, No. 23-cv-06012-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024) Skipping the copyright and trade secrets part of the case. (In brief: Meishe argued that Tiktok copied its code via an employee … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, dastar, false designation of origin, trade secrets
Leave a comment
Hetronic remand: the continued rise of “use”
Hetronic International, Inc. v. Hetronic Germany GmbH, — F.4th —-, Nos. 20-6057 & 20-6100, 2024 WL 1724995 (10th Cir. Apr. 23, 2024) Hetronic has US registrations; Abitron sold Hetronic-branded products without permission to customers around the world, including in the … Continue reading
Measuring device (c)able under Star Athletica; ignoring Dastar, court also allows false advertising claim
Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2024 WL 1829620, No. 8-23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024) Leszczynski invented a measuring cube that combines various measuring volumes into a single cubical structure. He posted the Cube design and 3D print files on … Continue reading
Use of competitor’s photo in comparative ads caused no (c) damage, appeals court holds
I Dig Texas, LLC v. Creager, — F.4th —-, 2024 WL 1590590, No. 23-5046 (10th Cir. Apr. 12, 2024) The district court found that use of a competitor’s photos in comparative advertising was fair use; the court of appeals affirms … Continue reading
Hospital’s use of Meta’s Pixel, despite promise to keep data private, plausibly deceptive
Mekhail v. North Memorial Health Care, — F.Supp.3d —- , 2024 WL 1332260, No. 23-CV-00440 (KMM/TNL) (D. Minn. Mar. 28, 2024) Mekhail alleged that North’s use of a piece of hidden software on its websites (a pixel developed by Meta) … Continue reading
Good Meat is descriptive for sustainable meat-related services, plausibly deceptive for lab-grown meat
Good Meat Project v. GOOD Meat, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —- , 2024 WL 1083462, No. 23-cv-04145-RFL (N.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024) GMP is a nonprofit focused on sustainable butchery and meat production practices. It provides farmers, ranchers, and butchers with … Continue reading