Tag Archives: conferences

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

 Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Non expressive uses: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 5: Beyond the DSA

Chair: João Quintais Samuelson: Joel Reidenberg’s Lex Informatica is a foundational text worth revisiting. Riffs off of the concept of law of trade; what happened was that people engaged in inter-area commerce made up sales law through their practices. Informal … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 4: Industry Impact and Industry Relationships

Chair: Daphne Keller: EU heavy compliance obligations + a bunch of other laws coming into effect right as platforms are laying off people who know how to do that—a bumpy road. Impulse Statement: Rachel Griffin: Technocratic approach to regulation; we … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 3: Algorithms Liability and Transparency

Chair: Martin Senftleben Impulse Statement: Sebastian Felix Schwemer Recommendation systems; transparency is the approach to recommender systems, which intersects with privacy/data protection. How much can we throw recommendation of information and moderation of information in the same bowl? Algorithmic recommendation/moderation: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 2: Data Access

Impulse Statement: Christophe Geiger: Relevance to © exceptions and limitations—access to © protected work is important for this work. Research organizations have exception in © Directive and also are vital to DSA, so we must look at both. Only digital … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Transatlantic Dialogue Workshop Institute for Information Law (IViR) Amsterdam Law School Part 1: Overarching Questions

My apologies, but I’m extremely jetlagged and will not attribute well or capture a lot of nuance. Chair: João Pedro Quintais Impulse Statement: Niva Elkin Koren: Déjà vu from 1990s: radical technology change, but the world is different and tech … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 4: Industry Perspectives

Moderator: Daphne Keller, Stanford Cyber Policy Center    DSA represents a shift to operational mandates compared to DMCA, Art. 17—thoughts? Sabrina Perelman, Pinterest: Important to remember what DSA is and isn’t. We’ve preserved the safe harbor, prohibition against general monitoring. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 3: Intended and Unintended Consequences of the DSA

 Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights        João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Shira Perlmutter, Register of Copyrights, Keynote on emerging tech

Shira Perlmutter AI detection and AI generation of content: CO has role to play in applications for registration and as advisors to Congress/exec branch on © law and policy. Use of tech measures to detect works online: we published a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

27th Annual BTLJ-BCLT Symposium: From the DMCA to the DSA: Panel 2: Will the DSA Achieve a “Brussels Effect”?

 Moderator: Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Copyright Law and/or/vs. a ‘Brussels Effect’ for the Digital Services Act Jennifer Urban, Berkeley Law School The Brussels Effect claim is descriptive, not predictive—can it apply to the DSA? Criteria favoring a Brussels Effect … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment