-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: copyright
WIPIP: IP for the Larger World
Koo, De-Colonising Copyright Law Is fair use even possible outside the US? If we want to export fair use, what is it we actually want to export? Many US academics many not think it’s the greatest idea—if we had a … Continue reading
WIPIP Panel 2B Copyright: Authorship, Ownership
Newman, Adoption as Authorship Concept of being an author: personally generating all the sensory signals other humans will process as part of the work—comes into being because my mind decides to put it there and my body guides it. Certainly … Continue reading
Two recent amicus briefs: Santos v. Kimmel and Sedlik v. Von Drachtenberg
In the Second Circuit, supporting fair use on a motion to dismiss in Santos v. Kimmel, and in the Ninth Circuit, supporting the jury’s verdict of lack of substantial similarity in Sedlik v. Von Drachtenberg. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2024/12/two-recent-amicus-briefs-santos-v.html
Celebration on Rimini Street as it achieves significant (c)/Lanham Act victories in 9th Circuit
Oracle Int’l Corp. v. Rimini Street, Inc., — F.4th —-, No. 23-16038, 2024 WL 5114449 (9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2024) Rimini Street gets a reasonably substantial victory in its long-running battle with Oracle in this appeal. Prior rulings held that … Continue reading
Reading list: Carys Craig, The AI-Copyright Trap
The AI-Copyright Trap Carys J. Craig Abstract As AI tools proliferate, policy makers are increasingly being called upon to protect creators and the cultural industries from the extractive, exploitative, and even existential threats posed by generative AI. In their haste … Continue reading
allegations of copied instructions lead to finding of noninfringement and possible 512(f) violation
MFB Fertility, Inc. v. Action Care Mobile Veterinary Clinic, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1719347, No. 23 cv 3854 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 22, 2024) MFB sued Action Care for copyright and trademark infringement; Action Care counterclaimed for misrepresentation under … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, defamation, dmca, tortious interference, trademark
Leave a comment
Reading list: Mala Chatterjee, Property, Speech, and Authorship: A Dilemma for Personhood Theories of Copyright
Recommended! Short and thought-provoking. Property, Speech, and Authorship: A Dilemma for Personhood Theories of Copyright Cambridge Volume on Intellectual Property & Private Law (forthcoming 2024) 15 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2024 Mala Chatterjee Columbia Law School Date Written: July 22, 2024 … Continue reading
when weak TM claims do better than seemingly strong false advertising claims
Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Technol. Int’l, 2024 WL 4553279, — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 1:18-cv-05385-SDG (N.D. Ga. May 20, 2024) Note: A jury found Kaijet liable for design patent and copyright infringement after this opinion, but rejected the TM claims, which … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, design patent, false advertising, trademark
Leave a comment
Revisiting Ty v. GMA
Ty, Inc. v. GMA Accessories, Inc., 132 F.3d 1167 (7th Cir. 1997), features dueling bean bag animals. I’ve never been convinced the two pigs at issue were substantially similar, even in staged pictures, but Harvard’s amazing librarians finally dug up … Continue reading
Another API (c) case with false advertising and contract claims too
Trackman, Inc. v. GSP Golf AB, 2024 WL 4276497, No. 23 Civ. 598 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2024) Trackman makes the golf simulator game Perfect Golf, which offers users the ability to virtually play some of the most famous golf … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged contracts, copyright, dastar, false advertising, preemption, trademark
Leave a comment