Tag Archives: design patent

when weak TM claims do better than seemingly strong false advertising claims

Posted on October 28, 2024 by rtushnet

Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Technol. Int’l, 2024 WL 4553279, — F.Supp.3d —-, No. 1:18-cv-05385-SDG (N.D. Ga. May 20, 2024) Note: A jury found Kaijet liable for design patent and copyright infringement after this opinion, but rejected the TM claims, which … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP session 7: Design Law

Posted on February 4, 2024 by rtushnet

Rachael Dickson, Administrative Discrimination? At the Trademark Office [I feel like there’s a Panic! At the Disco joke to be made here.] ID manual: a searchable database of acceptable IDs of goods/services, regularly updated and changed to adapt; you can … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

Posted on October 9, 2023 by rtushnet

Deetsch v. Lei, 2023 WL 6373073, No. 22-cv-1166-RSH-BLM (S.D. Cal. Jul. 21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. They also allegedly used Deetch’s image in ads and on packaging, … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Design Law Scholars Roundtable part 3

Posted on December 5, 2019 by rtushnet

Session 3: Shaping an Overall Approach to Protection Introductions: Jerry Reichman and Estelle Derclaye  In what ways should different forms of protection be tailored to various types of subject matter (construed legally as forms of intellectual property, but also subject … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Design Law Scholars Roundtable part 2

Posted on December 5, 2019 by rtushnet

Session 2: Legal Protection for Design Introduction: Chris Sprigman: what kinds of protection should be available depends on what the justifications for protection are. Incentives: requires us to ask about motivations of designers, the companies that employ them. Design of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Design Law Scholars Roundtable (Notre Dame) part 1

Posted on December 5, 2019 by rtushnet

I have just now gotten around to my notes from this excellent roundtable. Introduction: Mark McKenna & Graeme Dinwoodie Why do a roundtable like this? Putting together scholarly discussion for long-term outputs rather than particular works in the short term. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Celebration of the Work of Wendy Gordon, part 2

Posted on June 14, 2019 by rtushnet

Harmless Free Riding by Wendy Gordon, Boston University School of Law  (Additional related drafts from Wendy: Time and Intellectual Property After Coaseand Proximate Cause in the Law of Copyright: Linking Liability to Incentives) Common law imposes penalties on those who harm much more readily than … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Legal Applications of Marketing Theory, part 3

Posted on May 3, 2019 by rtushnet

Lorin Hitt, Vildan Altuglu, Samid Hussain, & Matteo Li Bergolis, Wharton & Cornerstone Research, Cornerstone Research, Cornerstone Research, Valuation of Privacy: Assessing Potential Harm from Unauthorized Access and Misuse of Private Information in Consumer Class Actions: Disputes over use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

TMSR, part 3

Posted on April 15, 2019 by rtushnet

Session 3: Defining Marks in Trademark Law vs. Defining Subject Matter in Adjacent Areas of IP In formulating rules about defining marks in trademark law, what (if anything) can be learned from the longstanding debate about defining pictorial, graphic, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WIPIP 2019, Plenary (designs)

Posted on February 12, 2019 by rtushnet

Whole Designs, Sarah Burstein What is a “design for a useful article”?  TLDR: it’s a whole article.  Egyptian Goddess said the infringement test has to be sameness of appearance. Must appear substantially the same to the ordinary observer. Worst design … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment