Tag Archives: false advertising

knowingly false statement of regulatory compliance may be actionable

Dental Recycling North America, Inc. v. Stoma Ventures, LLC, 2023 WL 6389071, No. 4:23 CV 670 CDP (E.D. Mo. Oct. 2, 2023) The parties compete in the market for amalgam capture devices, which remove fillings (or pieces thereof) from dental … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Proximate cause defeats false advertising claims against standard setting body allegedly packed by competitors

Geomatrix, LLC v. NSF International, — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 5925977, No. 22-1947 (6th Cir. Sept. 12, 2023) Discussion of opinion below. Geomatrix sells a septic system that substantially differs from those sold by its competitors. It asserts defendants, those … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Marketplace appearance: false advertising cases are fun!

 Transcript here. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/09/marketplace-appearance-false.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

claims against Starbucks fruit drinks without named fruit can continue

Kominis v. Starbucks Corp., 2023 WL 6066199, No. 22 Civ. 6673 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2023) Plaintiffs alleged violations of New York and California law based on Starbucks’ allegedly misleading use of fruit words for drinks.  The court allowed some … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Are Burger King menu boards whoppers?

Coleman v. Burger King Corp., No. 22-cv-20925-ALTMAN (S.D. Fla. Aug. 25, 2023) Plaintiffs alleged that Burger King, through its advertisements and in-store ordering boards, “materially overstates” the size of (and the amount of beef contained in) many of its burgers … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

claim that Adidas NHL jerseys are not “authentic” versions of on-ice jerseys can proceed

Smith v. Adidas America, Inc., 2023 WL 5672576, No. 6:22-cv-788 (BKS/ML) (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2023) A non-food case litigated by Spencer Sheehan, just profiled in this New Yorker article. Smith brought claims under NY and other consumer protection laws as … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

SlimFast products aren’t “clinically proven,” even if the SlimFast plan is, allowing false advertising claim to survive

McCracken v. KSF Acquisition Corp., 2023 WL 5667869, No. 5:22-cv-01666-SB-SHK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2023) McCracken alleged that SlimFast food products were falsely advertised as “CLINICALLY PROVEN [ – ] LOSE WEIGHT & KEEP IT OFF” on the front of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

plaintiff has standing to seek injunctive relief against allegedly falsely advertised penile implant

Peña v. International Medical Devices, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-03391-SSS-PLAx, 2023 WL 5667568 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2023) Plaintiff brought the usual California statutory claims against Penuma, a penile implant/procedure, for alleged misstatements about Penuma’s safety and efficacy. Here, we deal only … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

gray marketer’s counterclaims against Toyota survive, but it still must defend itself

One case, two opinions. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5206884, No. 22-cv-1681 (KMM/JFD) (D. Minn. Aug. 14, 2023) This opinion deals only with Allen’s counterclaims. Allen distributes Toyota replacement parts, manufactured by authorized suppliers … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“major flaw”/”tendency to shear” false advertising claims fail

Shepard & Assoc., Inc. v. Lokring Tech., LLC, 2023 WL 5229803, No. 1:20-cv-02488 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 15, 2023) Lokring sells fittings for pipes and other transfer systems for fluids and gases, as well as tools used to install them. Its … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment