Tag Archives: first amendment

thorough opinion allows CT’s greenwashing claims against Exxon to proceed

Posted on December 5, 2025 by rtushnet

State v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2025 WL 3459468, No. HHDCV206132568S (Conn. Super. Ct. Nov. 26, 2025) The court allows greenwashing claims against Exxon to proceed under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). The state alleged a decades-long “systematic campaign … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“abortion pill reversal” proponents engaged in noncommercial speech, 2d Circuit agrees for PI purposes

Posted on December 5, 2025 by rtushnet

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. James, — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 3439256, No. 24-2481-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 1, 2025) Unlike the similar California proceeding, the district court in NY granted a preliminary injunction against enforcement of consumer … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

California’s limits on use of “doctor” in healthcare settings are constitutional regulations of commercial speech

Posted on October 13, 2025 by rtushnet

Palmer v. Bonta, 2025 WL 2882948, No. EDCV 23-1047 JGB (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that California Business and Professions Code § 2054(a), on its face and as enforced, violates the First Amendment because it provides, in … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New article: History and Tradition in First Amendment Intellectual Property Cases: A Critique

Posted on August 11, 2025 by rtushnet

 Preprint available here. Abstract There are indications that the “history and tradition” approach the Supreme Court applied to gun rights and abortion restrictions may be coming for First Amendment doctrine. In intellectual property cases, it already has, with the Court using historical … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Closing plenary: DOGE; the First Amendment (me!); and the 50th anniversary of the Copyright Act

Posted on August 8, 2025 by rtushnet

David Schwartz (Northwestern Pritzker School of Law), Christopher Cotropia (The George Washington University Law School), DOGE Days at the USPTO? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Administrative Reform PTO provides some employees w/union protections and others not. As soon as … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Amicus brief on unconstitutionality of dilution by tarnishment

Posted on August 5, 2025 by rtushnet

 Filed in the return of JDI v. VIP to the Ninth Circuit. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/08/amicus-brief-on-unconstitutionality-of.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I write letters

Posted on July 31, 2025 by rtushnet

To Alan Garber & John Manning: As a member of the law faculty (and, not for nothing, a professor of the First Amendment), I am writing you to express my strong opposition to any “settlement” with the Trump Administration. Harvard … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“abortion reversal” promoter engaged in inherently and potentially misleading commercial speech, court rules

Posted on June 20, 2025 by rtushnet

Culture of Life Family Services, Inc. v. Bonta, 2025 WL 1677783, No. 3:24-cv-01338-GPC-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2025) In two opinions on the same day, the court didn’t give much comfort to an “abortion reversal” provider. COLFS sought to enjoin … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

nonprofits’ promotion of “abortion reversal” services was commercial speech

Posted on April 22, 2025 by rtushnet

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Bonta, No. 2:24-CV-08468-HDV-(MARx), 2025 WL 1140450 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2025) Not sure this one survives appellate review, but we’ll see. NIFLA sued for injunctive relief against California AG Bonta over his … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Rogers v. Grimaldi lives on, at least for work content

Posted on February 28, 2025 by rtushnet

Of note because the lawsuit was brought at all, suggesting that trademark owners are willing to try to roll back any First Amendment protections for noncommercial speech. Pepperdine University v. Netflix, Inc., No. 2:25-cv-01429-CV (ADSx), 2025 WL 632983 (C.D. Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment