-
Recent Posts
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
- Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: patent
WIPIP, plenary session 1
WIPIP, University of Washington School of Law Plenary Session 1: Innovation Policy Stephanie Bair, Promoting the Useful Arts: Corporate Edition 87% of patents are assigned to organizations, not individuals. How to motivate individuals/employees? Assumption is usually that companies … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, patent, plenary session 1 conferences, WIPIP
Leave a comment
Showing irreparable harm isn’t easy
Pruvit Ventures, Inc. v. ForeverGreen International LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2015 WL 9876952 No. 15-CV-571 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2015) (magistrate judge) Defendants moved for a preliminary injunction on their counterclaims involving dietary suppplements. Defendant Axcess is the exclusive … Continue reading
AALS panel on the scope of IP rights
Intellectual Property – Interpreting the Scope of IP Rights Moderator: Zahr Said, University of Washington School of Law Margaret-Jane Radin, The University of Michigan Law School: Patent scope. The problem of describing innovation (thing in the world) in words. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged AALS panel on the scope of IP rights conferences, copyright, patent, trademark
Leave a comment
CFP 2015: Internet content blocking by the ITC
Computers, Freedom & Privacy Conference 2015 Internet Content Blocking by the U.S. International Trade Commission. In April 2014, a little-known agency called the U.S. International Trade Commission handed itself power to block data on the Internet. Internet companies fear … Continue reading
Notre Dame Roundtable on Drassinower, Part 4
Session IV – Subject Matter and Limitations • Rebecca Tushnet Drassinower defines trademark as the right to completely control the meaning of a mark as applied to a good or service: radically unidirectional, like a one-way traffic sign, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Notre Dame Roundtable on Drassinower, part 4 conferences, patent, trademark
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 7
Mark Lemley – Ready for Patenting Patent’s problematic approach to what we want to encourage when we grant a patent. Long struggle with what you are giving us is simply an idea/conception or an actual thing/reduction to practice. Various … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 7 conferences, patent
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 6
Margaret Jane Radin – Patent Notice and the Trouble with Plain Meaning Notice is a cost and a cost-saver; hard to figure out its overall profile. Plain meaning as ever-receding ideal. Philips v. AWH (Fed. Cir. 2005); Festo … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 6 conferences, patent
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 3
Pamela Samuelson – Notice Failures Arising from Copyright Duration Rules Agrees w/ other expressions of concern about notice failures in copyright—here she focuses on notice failures related to the long duration of copyrights. More information about work’s © status … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, Notice and Notice Failure at BU, panel 3 conferences, patent
Leave a comment
Notice and Notice Failure in Intellectual Property Law at BU, keynote
Boston University School of Law Welcome and introduction: Dean Maureen O’Roarke New clinic w/MIT—representing MIT students who need legal/IP help. Searching for an exec. director now—encourages applications. Stacey Dogan: Meurer & James Besson’s book on patents: pointed out … Continue reading
Journal of Patent & Trademark Office Society’s Mid-Atlantic student writing competition
As the oldest publishing intellectual property law journal in America, the Journal of Patent & Trademark Office Society (JPTOS) provides a forum dedicated to the discussion of legal and technical subjects related to patent, trademark, and copyright laws. JPTOS boasts … Continue reading