-
Recent Posts
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
- Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: trademark
Panels on Exploring the New Constitutional Limits on Trademark Law
FRIDAY, NOV 3 2023 8:45AM – 3:30PM More info ADVANCED REGISTRATION REQUIRED ATTEND AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FRANKLIN PIERCE SCHOOL OF LAW OR BY ZOOM. Full program. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/10/panels-on-exploring-new-constitutional.html
5th Circuit holds that inquiries weigh less than lost sales but can still be evidence of actual confusion
Rex Real Estate I, L.P. v. Rex Real Estate Exchange, Incorporated, — F.4th —-, 2023 WL 5735552, No. 22-50405 (5th Cir. Sept. 6, 2023) Doctrinal evolution is so fascinating! Here, I think we might be starting to see what a … Continue reading
gray marketer’s counterclaims against Toyota survive, but it still must defend itself
One case, two opinions. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Allen Interchange LLC, 2023 WL 5206884, No. 22-cv-1681 (KMM/JFD) (D. Minn. Aug. 14, 2023) This opinion deals only with Allen’s counterclaims. Allen distributes Toyota replacement parts, manufactured by authorized suppliers … Continue reading
claims about legality of insurance service are falsifable
Route App, Inc. v. Heuberger, 2023 WL 5334192, No. 2:22-cv-00291-TS-JCB (D. Utah Aug. 18, 2023) (magistrate) Route is a package tracking company that provides shipping insurance to e-commerce merchants. Heuberger was a Route customer who then launched a competitor, Navidium. … Continue reading
state consumer protection law gives competitor plaintiff more leeway than Lanham Act, court holds
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Company, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4463246, No. 2:17-cv-00702-RJS-DAO (D. Utah Jul. 11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, false advertising, tortious interference, trademark
Leave a comment
Seen at the Capital Jewish Museum
Fundraising brochure, Jewish Community Center of Northern Virginia 1989: “You should invest in community property” with Monopoly theme: from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/08/seen-at-capital-jewish-museum.html
What can experts testify to in Lanham Act cases? Not the law or regulations
GOLO, LLC v. Goli Nutrition Inc., 2023 WL 4952576, No. 20-667-RGA (D. Del. Aug. 3, 2023) Potentially interesting pretrial rulings in this false advertising/TM case: Goli’s motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Jerry Wind was granted in part to … Continue reading
IPSC Closing Plenary Session
An Author/Reader Conversation about Jessica Silbey, Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Internet Age (2022) Robert Brauneis: Three layers—(1) object of discovery: creator and innovator accounts, concerns, what kind of conditions support/hinder them in their work; (2) … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, patent, trade secrets, trademark
Leave a comment
IPSC Breakout Session #5 Platforms & Interfaces/IP Enforcement
Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Tech Bros, Social Media, and the End of IP Financing? Ideas are nothing without financing. Banks will not give loans secured by patents; banking law constraints. How was Silicon Valley Bank able to make loans to startups before … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session #1
Too much to choose from; I prioritized things that were new to me. Mark Bartholomew, A Right to Be Left Dead If we can create new works in a dead author’s style after they’re gone and create conversations with them … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, right of publicity, trademark
Leave a comment