-
Recent Posts
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
- Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: trademark
IPSC: TM III/Music
Trademark III Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Chicago–Kent College of Law – Illinois Institute of Technology, Not Just the Gutting of Rogers: A Window into Modern Trademark Challenges Defenses developed much more seriously in the US than in Europe. Rogers was an … Continue reading
IPSC: TM II/(c) II
Trademark II Mary Catherine Amerine, The George Washington University Law School, Mind the Gap: How Brand Gimmicks Have Made Infinite the Zone of Expansion Doritos x Empirical alcohol: on shelves for three years. Tesla mezcal. Le Moutarde Vin wine cobranded … Continue reading
IPSC: TM I/(c) I
IPSC, DePaul Trademark I Stacey Dogan, Boston University School of Law, Hollywood’s Trademark Law Courts seem to be treating classically expressive uses, including titles of movies, as source-indicating; Kagan didn’t seem to intend this result and courts should be more … Continue reading
Amicus brief on unconstitutionality of dilution by tarnishment
Filed in the return of JDI v. VIP to the Ninth Circuit. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/08/amicus-brief-on-unconstitutionality-of.html
resale is not a misrepresentation of being an authorized seller under false advertising law
FB Select, LLC v. Ocean Blue Trading, LLC, No. 24-cv-8425 (PKC), 2025 WL 2172653 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2025) Finding cases where TM and false advertising law give different outputs on the same facts because of lack of harm/materiality/falsity is my … Continue reading
alleged use of competitor’s corporate “persona” didn’t cause actionable confusion
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Co., LLC, No. 2023-2426, 2025 WL 2057365 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 23, 2025) Discussion of previous district court opinion here. Because a patent is involved, the appeal on all issues goes to the Federal … Continue reading
no initial interest confusion from a deactivated product page that list zero results
Alsa Refinish LLC v. The Home Depot, Inc., 2025 WL 2014281, No. 2:23-cv-09965-SVW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2025) Previous discussion of related case by same plaintiff. The Home Depot “sells home improvement products, including a wide assortment of paints and … Continue reading
XL BBL and Petite BBL are generic for what you think they’re generic for
Andre P. Marshall, M.D. Inc. v. Squlpt Management, LLC, 2025 WL 2025000, No. 2:24-cv-01784-SB-AS (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2025) The interesting false advertising component of this case doesn’t get resolved on summary judgment, but we do get a finding that … Continue reading
New book chapter on advertising, TM, and antitrust
Misleading advertising as a matter of unfair competition law Graeme B Dinwoodie and Ansgar Ohly (eds), Research Handbook on Unfair Competition and Passing Off (Edward Elgar, forthcoming 2026) Abstract The prohibition of false and misleading advertising should be the prototypical … Continue reading
breast pump rules: Think Green’s trade dress claims against Medela proceed to trial
Think Green Ltd. v. Medela AG, 2025 WL 1826137, No. 21 CV 5445 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 2, 2025) Think Green sued Medela for infringing its trade dress in its breast pump, as well as false advertising claims that were quickly … Continue reading