Tag Archives: trademark

IPSC: Trademarks in Society

Jonathan Masur, University of Chicago Law School, Measuring the Value of Trademark Distinctiveness: Evidence from the Market for Bordeaux Wines Branding is important; confusion is the core justification for TM to allow consumers to get what they want and firms … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC: Copyright Fair Use and User Rights/Trademark IV

Copyright Fair Use and User Rights Stav Zeitouni, UC Berkeley School of Law, A Theory of Noncommerciality in Fair Use Lots of incoherent concepts—Hachette v. Internet Archive is example where dct used “failed to pay the customary price,” but ct … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: TM III/Music

Trademark III Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Chicago–Kent College of Law – Illinois Institute of Technology, Not Just the Gutting of Rogers: A Window into Modern Trademark Challenges Defenses developed much more seriously in the US than in Europe. Rogers was an … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: TM II/(c) II

Trademark II Mary Catherine Amerine, The George Washington University Law School, Mind the Gap: How Brand Gimmicks Have Made Infinite the Zone of Expansion Doritos x Empirical alcohol: on shelves for three years. Tesla mezcal. Le Moutarde Vin wine cobranded … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: TM I/(c) I

IPSC, DePaul Trademark I Stacey Dogan, Boston University School of Law, Hollywood’s Trademark Law Courts seem to be treating classically expressive uses, including titles of movies, as source-indicating; Kagan didn’t seem to intend this result and courts should be more … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Amicus brief on unconstitutionality of dilution by tarnishment

 Filed in the return of JDI v. VIP to the Ninth Circuit. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/08/amicus-brief-on-unconstitutionality-of.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

resale is not a misrepresentation of being an authorized seller under false advertising law

FB Select, LLC v. Ocean Blue Trading, LLC, No. 24-cv-8425 (PKC), 2025 WL 2172653 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2025) Finding cases where TM and false advertising law give different outputs on the same facts because of lack of harm/materiality/falsity is my … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

alleged use of competitor’s corporate “persona” didn’t cause actionable confusion

SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Co., LLC, No. 2023-2426, 2025 WL 2057365 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 23, 2025) Discussion of previous district court opinion here. Because a patent is involved, the appeal on all issues goes to the Federal … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

no initial interest confusion from a deactivated product page that list zero results

Alsa Refinish LLC v. The Home Depot, Inc., 2025 WL 2014281, No. 2:23-cv-09965-SVW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2025) Previous discussion of related case by same plaintiff. The Home Depot “sells home improvement products, including a wide assortment of paints and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

XL BBL and Petite BBL are generic for what you think they’re generic for

Andre P. Marshall, M.D. Inc. v. Squlpt Management, LLC, 2025 WL 2025000, No. 2:24-cv-01784-SB-AS (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2025) The interesting false advertising component of this case doesn’t get resolved on summary judgment, but we do get a finding that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment