Monthly Archives: September 2025

“tasting like a smooth whisky” is not a disclosure that there’s no whisky in the bottle

Pizzaro v. Sazerac Co., 2025 WL 2682673, No. 23-CV-2751 (KMK), No. 23-CV-4323 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2025) The court certifies a class of purchasers alleging deception in their purchases of Fireball and Parrot Bay malt beverage (16.5% ABV) that looked … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

mislabeling nut ingredients doesn’t justify class action because not everyone has nut allergies

Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC, No. 23-cv-00099-RFL, 2025 WL 2644747 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2025) Fukaya, who is allergic to tree nuts, alleged that Daiso failed to properly label its pre-packaged food products as containing tree nuts on its English-language … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

sending DMCA notices about uncopyrightable work might be willful blindness, or not

Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2025 WL 2551098, No. 8:23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) Previous discussion. I find this case interesting because of the underlying gadget, the Kitchen Cube, which has depressions on different sides corresponding to different standard … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

2021 statements, even if false, not plausibly connected to 2024 sales loss

Trilogy Federal, LLC v. CivitasDX LLC, No. 24-2713, No. 25-792, 2025 WL 2651240 (D.D.C. Sept. 16, 2025) Just looking at the false advertising-related aspects of a complicated dispute. The parties sought to sell things to the government, specifically the VA. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

TM question of the day: more than meets the eye?

 My spouse and I both noticed this campaign around DC–it’s some sort of miltech. But what does Hasbro think? I found a page where the ad agency brags about creating limited edition action figures, which do look a lot like … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

general competitor has Lanham Act standing even if it doesn’t compete in alleged false advertiser’s subcategory

Colorado Biolabs, Inc. v. Three Arrows Nutra, LLC, No. 3:25-CV-0601-D, 2025 WL 2524313 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2025) CBL sued Three Arrows for breach of a settlement agreement and related claims; Three Arrows counterclaimed along similar lines. The parties sell … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

3d Circuit affirmance shows that false advertising damages remain hard to prove

CareDX, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., 2025 WL 2480117, No. 23-2427, No. 23-2428 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2025) The court of appeals affirms the district court in this Lanham Act/coordinate Delaware state law case based on allegedly false claims Natera made … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

keyword ad claim fails out of the gate, but bad (c) claim not yet challenged

Regalo Int’l LLC v. Aborder Prods. Inc, 2025 WL 2483167, No. 3:24-CV-03270-E (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2025) Eric Goldman on the keyword ad aspects of this case about pet and baby gates. Regalo alleged that Aborder sold “knock-offs of Plaintiffs’ … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment