Author Archives: rtushnet

IPSC Closing Plenary: Fair Use After Warhol

Christopher Buccafusco, Copyrighting Style There are plenty of precedents that say style isn’t ©able. Appropriating the “core” of a work is not infringing in the absence of substantial similarity.there are also cases suggesting ©ability of style: Steinberg, saying style is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 5 Comparative Approaches

Stefania Fusco (co-author Valerio Sterzi), Does the EU Need an EBay-Like Case? Evidence Against Granting Automatic Injunctions in Europe Patent paper; issues involving NPEs similar to trolling issues in US. If most infringement cases are between noncompetitors, automatic injunction is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 4 IP and Property/Contract Theory

Shyam Balganesh, The Eunomics of Intellectual Property Lon Fuller’s institutional design theory: understand institutional design as a way of understanding institutions on the understanding that they’re not infinitely mutable. One shouldn’t begin with an unilateral approach on their ends. Ordinary … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Breakout 3: Trademark and Unfair Competition

Mary Catherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in False Advertising and Trademark Consumers can devote much more (or less) time to a decision than seems rational for the amount of risk/benefit in their lives. Court expects consumers to be reasonably prudent … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC session 2 copyright/trademark

Copyrightable Subject Matter Kevin Collins, Copyright in Suburbia (Collins is a registered architect as well as a law prof) The stakes: whether © is “working” in suburbia matters in ways that might not be self-evident. Snack box approach: scattered observations … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: IP in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court and some TM

Mark Bartholomew, Publicity Rights After Warhol Risk that courts will apply Warhol to ROP cases, but transformativeness is the only element in the ROP defense as defined by the California SCt rather than a multifactor fair use test. This could … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

IP Outside the (Doctrinal) Box Andrew Gilden: Love & Hate in IP IP’s struggles with joy, pleasure, and fun—happens with sex, but also with enjoyment. Courts are pretty openly hostile to statements by Ds that they enjoyed engaging in the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“fair and skill-based” may falsely imply absence of bots in online gaming

Skillz Platform Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., 2024 WL 3526853, No. 24cvl646(DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 23, 2024) Skillz sued its competitor in mobile gaming, Papaya, for violating federal and NY law against false advertising by falsely advertising that its games pit … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

“Pure Irish Butter” plausibly misleads as to absence of dangerous chemicals

Winans v. Ornua Foods North America Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2024 WL 1741079, No. 2:23-cv-01198-FB-RML (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that the presence of per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (“PFAS”) in Kerrygold butter made the use of “pure Irish butter” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

No copyright over simple colors and shapes used to annotate X-rays

Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc., 2024 WL 3480212, No. 24-cv-10446-ADB (D. Mass. Jul. 19, 2024) The court denied Overjet’s request for a preliminary injunction on copyright and false advertising claims, concluding that Overjet’s selection of colors and shapes for annotating … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment