Author Archives: rtushnet

two Zillow false advertising cases, divergent outcomes

REX – Real Estate Exchange Inc. v. Zillow Inc., No. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and false advertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“tested” can misleadingly imply high performance on test

Carder v. Graco Children’s Products, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 3909953, No. 2:20-CV-00137-LMM (N.D. Ga. Aug. 31, 2021) Plaintiffs from fifteen states alleged that Graco made false and misleading representations about two models of children’s car seats, specifically marketing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reading list: The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law

Ilanah Fhima & Dev S. Gangjee, The Confusion Test in European Trade Mark Law (2019) A very helpful overview. From a US perspective, offers real insights into how a system of registration primacy differs from a system of use primacy. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

tortious interference claim from false advertising survives, but why bother?

Logistick, Inc. v. AB Airbags, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2021 WL 2433944, No. 3:21-cv-00151-BEN-MDD (S.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021) Logistick sells disposable load bars which are used to secure cargo freight during transport. AB allegedly began advertising for a similar … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

expert admissibility, literal falsity receive close review in drug disposal case

In re C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc., No. 18-30182-beh, 2021 WL 1347193 (E.D. Wis. Bkrcy. Mar. 30, 2021) Previous denial of injunctive relief. There are a number of opinions in this case—the judge spent time on this rather unusual false advertising … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

slack fill and “healthy” claims unite in one case

Stewart v. Kodiak Cakes, LLC, 2021 WL 1698695, No. 19-cv-2454-MMA (MSB) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2021) Plaintiffs alleged that Kodiak was liable for “(1) non-functional slack fill and (2) deceptive marketing practices” for its pancake and waffle mixes. Defendant misleadingly … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

getting friends to leave fake reviews isn’t enough for direct liability

BHRS Gp., LLC v. Brio Water Technol. Inc., 2020 WL 9422352, No. 2:20-CV-07652-JWH-JCx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2020) BHRS, which makes water cooler products, sued its competitor Brio for state and federal false advertising and trade libel.  BHRS alleged that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

IIC decision also says some things about false advertising: materiality may not be presumed from literal falsity

Select Comfort Corp. v. Baxter; 996 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2021) You probably know that the court of appeals sent this case back for retrial on an initial interest confusion theory. I won’t say much about that, though I do … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Journalism about investment isn’t commercial speech

Crash Proof Retirement, LLC v. Price, 2021 WL 1387501, No. 2:20-cv-05906-JDW (E.D. Pa. Apr. 13, 2021) Competing in the marketplace of ideas can ground a defamation claim, but not a false advertising claim. Crash Proof, which offers retirement planning counseling, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Microsoft dodges some false advertising claims based on its security offerings

Tocmail Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 2020 WL 9210739, No. 20-60416-CIV-SMITH (S.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2020) From the deepest depths of backlog: Tocmail alleged that Microsoft’s deceptive promotions of its cyber-security service, Safe Links, constituted false advertising and contributory false advertising. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment