Author Archives: rtushnet

competitor has state, federal standing to challenge nondisparaging false ads

Jerome’s Furniture Warehouse v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., 2021 WL 1541649, No. 20CV1765-GPC(BGS) (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021) Jerome’s alleged false advertising under state and federal law based on Ashley’s alleged false advertising  “intended to deceive customers into falsely believing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Apple’s “buy” button that doesn’t result in ownership may mislead consumers

Andino v. Apple, Inc., 2021 WL 1549667, No. 2:20-cv-01628-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021) iTunes allows consumers to “Rent” or “Buy” movies, television shows, music and other content. Renting is less expensive; buying leads the content to appear in a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Coffee lawsuits brewing

Two cases, suggesting a newly discovered litigation vein. Ashton v. J.M. Smucker Co., No. EDCV 20-992 JGB (SHKx), 2020 WL 8575140 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2020) Plaintiffs alleged that representations on the front of Folgers ground coffee cans, including “MAKES … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Informational functionality is a thing now

Sulzer Mixpac AG v. A&N Trading Co., No. 19-2951 (2d Cir. Feb. 18, 2021) The parties compete in the U.S. market for mixing tips used by dentists to create impressions of teeth for dental procedures, such as crowns. Reversing the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

organic protein is generic, but trade dress comes to the rescue

Orgain, Inc. v. Northern Innovations Holding Corp., 2021 WL 1321653, No. 8:18-cv-01253-JLS-ADS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2021) The parties compete in the market for nutritional supplements. Orgain alleged that defendants infringed its trade dress in selling a competing plant-based nutritional … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Uber’s expansion into ads hits a TM hurdle

Uber Inc. v. Uber Technol., Inc., No. 20-cv-2320 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2021) Uber Inc. has offered design and marketing services under the name “Uber” since 1999. Uber Technologies, the one you know about, was incorporated in 2010. As it … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

lawyer doesn’t make use in commerce by negotiating for client

Big Ligas, LLC v. Yu, 2021 WL 1518993, No. 20-23719-Civ-Scola (S.D. Fla. Apr. 16, 2021) Big Ligas is owned by three members equally: Daniel Echavarria, also known as Ovy; Christian Andres Salazar; and Paulo Londra. Ovy and Salazar are the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Coach narrowly alleges grounds for cancellation of similar marks

Tapestry, Inc. v. Chunma USA, Inc., 2021 WL 1534988, No. 20-CV-0271 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2021) Tapestry (Coach) sued Chunma for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, false advertising, and cancellation of Chunma’s registered trademarks under the Lanham Act, unfair … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

There’s no such thing as “leasing real estate in violation of the Lanham Act”

Wakefern Food Corp. v. Marchese, 2021 WL 3783259, No. 2:20-cv-15949-WJM-MF (D.N.J. Aug. 26, 2021) Always something new in trademark! Wakefern, the largest retailer-owned supermarket coop in the US, sued Marchese for attempting “to lease commercial real estate in violation of … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Is disgorgement the new normal in Lanham Act cases?

Grasshopper House, LLC v. Clean & Sober Media, LLC, 2021 WL 3702243, No. 19-56008, No. 19-56072, — Fed.Appx. —- (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2021) The TMA’s injunctive relief changes are probably going to make it even more clear that courts … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment