-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
(c) licensor’s claims about competitor’s allegedly worse licenses were opinion, not falsifiable fact
Tresóna Multimedia, LLC v. Pre-Cleared Ltd. D/B/A ClicknClear, 2026 WL 480858, No. 25-cv-6202 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2026) Tresóna, a music copyright licensing entity, sued competitor ClicknClear for NY state and federal false advertising. The court dismissed the claim. Since … Continue reading
Fairlife brand name plausibly misleading where cows allegedly lived abuse-filled lives of suffering
Bhotiwihok v. Fairlife, LLC, № 2:25-cv-01650-ODW (AGRx), 2026 WL 413749 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2026) “In 2014, Select Milk, a dairy cooperative, partnered with Coca-Cola to launch Fairlife, a company with an eponymous line of premium milk and milk products…. … Continue reading
disgorgement can’t be a lottery windfall–even when D was engaged in illegal gambling
TNT Amusements, Inc. v. Torch Electronics, LLC, 2026 WL 411747, No. 4:23-CV-330-JAR (E.D. Mo. Feb. 13, 2025) Previously. TNT leases traditional arcade games in retail locations throughout Missouri. Torch Electronics leases “no-chance” gaming devices in the same market. A jury … Continue reading
CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
Second Annual Aspiring Free Speech Scholars Workshopjointly sponsored by the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law (ASU)and the Hoover Institution (Stanford University) Are you a law student, judicial law clerk, lawyer, or beginning academic hoping to publish a journal article … Continue reading
“ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
Ramirez v. S. Martinelli & Co., 2026 WL 272621, No. 25-cv-07569-NC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2026) Martinelli’s apple juice products’ front labels state either “Premium 100% Juice Not From Concentrate” or “100% Juice From U.S. Grown Fresh Apples.” The products … Continue reading
conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
Vicious Brands, Inc. v. Face Co., No. 24-cv-04996-LJC, 2026 WL 276178 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2026) (magistrate) Plaintiff, aka Saints & Sinners, sued Face, aka Skin Saint, alleging trademark infringement and false advertising. The court granted the motion to dismiss … Continue reading
Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
Moderator: Edward Lee, Santa Clara Law BJ Ard (copyright), University of Wisconsin Law School © is often displaced by contract and other regimes in sectors—scaling it up or down would produce minimal impact. Consumer copying for example is often solved … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, patent, right of publicity, trade secrets, trademark
Leave a comment
Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Moderator: Zahr Said, Santa Clara Law Mark Lemley (patent), Stanford Law School After 40 years of radical change, things settled down for normalcy in the last 10 years until Trump. 1980-2017: we grant 350,000 a year up from 50,000; now … Continue reading
Santa Clara School of Law: Intellectual Property Conference: How It Started, How It’s Going: What Went Right?
Moderator: Brian Love, Santa Clara Law Jeanne Fromer (trademark), New York University Law School Search and examination on relative grounds (Europe doesn’t do that)—has critiques but generally doing a decent job. Ironic b/c we think of US as “free market” … Continue reading
False endorsement claim can proceed against gov’t issued license plates and gov’t facility named for Roberto Clemente
Clemente Properties, Inc. v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, — F.4th —-, 2026 WL 125574, No. 23-1922 (1st Cir. Jan. 16, 2026) The representatives of the family of a famous deceased Puerto Rico baseball player, Roberto Clemente, sued the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, false advertising, false endorsement, trademark
Leave a comment