-
Recent Posts
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subject Matter; Copyright Theory and Doctrine II
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- “shipping protection fee” providing no extra protection was plausibly misleading drip pricing
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: copyright
WIPIP session 3: Cultural Production
Bita Amani: Forbidden Arts & Subjugated Knowledges: On the Polemics of Intellectual Property IP rights are state-dependent, property-dependent models so make false promises of equality. History of art as propaganda: art can support war or speak truth to power. Iran … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, trademark, traditional knowledge
Leave a comment
WIPIP session 2: ™ Doctrine, © Fair Use
Barbara Lauriat, Borrowing Goodwill Comparative/historical approach to doctrine/theory. There used to be a big difference between having a TM and passing off. Bone/McKenna’s history of goodwill: didn’t reflect her understanding of the history: seen goodwill used as a property right … Continue reading
WIPIP Session 1: AI
Nikola Datzov, Can AI Keep a (Trade) Secret? We’ve funneled IP protection for AI generated inventions/information to trade secrecy w/o patent or copyright for human authors/inventors. But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. How can we trust AI … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, right of publicity, trade secrets
Leave a comment
new article w/Mark Lemley: First Amendment Neglect in SCOTUS IP Cases
First Amendment Neglect in Supreme Court Intellectual Property Cases Mark A. Lemley & Rebecca Tushnet (forthcoming, Supreme Court Review) Abstract The Supreme Court decided two cases of central importance to free speech during the 2022 term – in both cases … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged commercial speech, copyright, first amendment, my writings, trademark
Leave a comment
Using dominant competitor’s part names/numbers for comparison isn’t false advertising, TM infringement, or (c) infringement
There really should be a fee shift when a competitor harasses another competitor for daring to make comparisons of part numbers, but we don’t seem to live in that world. Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. Mitek Inc., 2023 WL 8697700, No. … Continue reading
using testimonials post-relationship failure can be a ROP problem
McCandless Group, LLC v. COY Collective, Inc., No. LA CV 21-02069-DOC-KES, 2023 WL 8351525 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2023) The individual defendants co-founded COY in 2019 to provide creator clients with a platform to offer subscription services. COY hired MG … Continue reading
court finds that transferring title to mural also transferred (c); VARA and CMI claims against ad also fail
Williams v. Hy-Vee, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 3602813, No. 4:22-cv-00025-RGE-HCA (S.D. Iowa Mar. 15, 2023) Williams, a professional artist, was commissioned to paint an abstract mural on the wall of a building located in Des Moines, Iowa. The … Continue reading
too much complaining about copying triggers Dastar/preemption for other claims
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Hall, 2023 WL 8103156, No. 3:23-cv-186-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2023) Design Gaps produces custom cabinetry for high-end homes; Hall is a former employee of Design Gaps who signed a nonsolicitation/noncompete clause but went to work for … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright, dastar, false advertising, false designation of origin
Leave a comment
Holly Herndon and AI in the New Yorker
Article here. I’m quoted. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/11/holly-herndon-and-ai-in-new-yorker.html