Tag Archives: copyright

IPSC Breakout 4 IP and Property/Contract Theory

Shyam Balganesh, The Eunomics of Intellectual Property Lon Fuller’s institutional design theory: understand institutional design as a way of understanding institutions on the understanding that they’re not infinitely mutable. One shouldn’t begin with an unilateral approach on their ends. Ordinary … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC session 2 copyright/trademark

Copyrightable Subject Matter Kevin Collins, Copyright in Suburbia (Collins is a registered architect as well as a law prof) The stakes: whether © is “working” in suburbia matters in ways that might not be self-evident. Snack box approach: scattered observations … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC: IP in the Aftermath of the Supreme Court and some TM

Mark Bartholomew, Publicity Rights After Warhol Risk that courts will apply Warhol to ROP cases, but transformativeness is the only element in the ROP defense as defined by the California SCt rather than a multifactor fair use test. This could … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

IP Outside the (Doctrinal) Box Andrew Gilden: Love & Hate in IP IP’s struggles with joy, pleasure, and fun—happens with sex, but also with enjoyment. Courts are pretty openly hostile to statements by Ds that they enjoyed engaging in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

No copyright over simple colors and shapes used to annotate X-rays

Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc., 2024 WL 3480212, No. 24-cv-10446-ADB (D. Mass. Jul. 19, 2024) The court denied Overjet’s request for a preliminary injunction on copyright and false advertising claims, concluding that Overjet’s selection of colors and shapes for annotating … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Slow fashion: checkerboard design plausibly infringes another checkerboard design

Hian v. Louis Vuitton USA Inc, 2024 WL 3237591, No. 22-3742 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024) The court tosses out most of an independent fashion designer’s claims against LVMH, while preserving one copyright infringement claim based on a distorted checkerboard … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tiktok’s other, smaller legal problem

Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co. v. Tiktok Inc., 2024 WL 1772833, No. 23-cv-06012-SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2024) Skipping the copyright and trade secrets part of the case. (In brief: Meishe argued that Tiktok copied its code via an employee … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Measuring device (c)able under Star Athletica; ignoring Dastar, court also allows false advertising claim

Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2024 WL 1829620, No. 8-23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024) Leszczynski invented a measuring cube that combines various measuring volumes into a single cubical structure. He posted the Cube design and 3D print files on … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Use of competitor’s photo in comparative ads caused no (c) damage, appeals court holds

I Dig Texas, LLC v. Creager, — F.4th —-, 2024 WL 1590590, No. 23-5046 (10th Cir. Apr. 12, 2024) The district court found that use of a competitor’s photos in comparative advertising was fair use; the court of appeals affirms … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The People’s Joker

 Interesting NYT story, in which I am quoted. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-peoples-joker.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment