-
Recent Posts
- trademark law firm loses trademark lawsuit
- license agreement termination might be invalid transfer in gross without a new partner for licensor
- Reading list and comments: Doctrine, Data, and the Death of DuPont
- reasonable consumers read promotion terms on a gambling app, court rules
- Third Circuit affirms disgorgement award in “Made in the USA” case
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
A couple of Third Circuit amicus briefs (AI training and false advertising harm)
Thomson Reuters v. Ross, arguing that training is fair use. With Edward Lee of Santa Clara Law, Matthew Sag of Emory University, Pamela Samuelson of UC Berkeley School of Law, Christopher John Sprigman of New York University School of Law. And an … Continue reading
We have (less of) the meats: court mostly denies Arby’s motion to dismiss in misleading photos case
Alongis v. Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc., 2025 WL 2772810, 2:23-cv-6593 (NJC) (LGD) (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2025) The court declines to dismiss claims under the NY GBL that Arby’s photographs misrepresented (1) whether its roast beef was rare rather than fully … Continue reading
court dismisses popcorn calorie/slack fill claims for failure to account for popcorn’s compressibility
Borgen v. Hershey Salty Snack Sales Co., 2025 WL 2753734, No. 24-cv-1635-BJC-JLB (S.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2025) I just like the facts here: Plaintiffs alleged that defendants’ SkinnyPop popcorn has too much slack fill. In particular, they alleged that the … Continue reading
Audible’s expiring credits covered by Washington’s gift certificate law, court rules
Hollis v. Audible, Inc., 2025 WL 2689123, No. 2:24-cv-01999-TL (W.D. Wash. Sept. 19, 2025) State consumer protection laws sometimes address very specific topics; this case addresses the intersection of one such law with Audible’s membership, which provides customers (including me) … Continue reading
pharmacos face judicial resistance to claims against compounding pharmacies for weight loss drugs
Three cases showing aspects of the challenges, only one of which even partially survives: Novo Nordisk, Inc. v. Brooksville Pharm. Inc., 785 F.Supp.3d 1123 (M.D. Fla. 2025) Novo Nordisk sells FDA-approved drugs containing semaglutide, Wegovy, Ozempic, and Rybelsus. Brooksville is … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preclusion, preemption
Leave a comment
“tasting like a smooth whisky” is not a disclosure that there’s no whisky in the bottle
Pizzaro v. Sazerac Co., 2025 WL 2682673, No. 23-CV-2751 (KMK), No. 23-CV-4323 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 18, 2025) The court certifies a class of purchasers alleging deception in their purchases of Fireball and Parrot Bay malt beverage (16.5% ABV) that looked … Continue reading
mislabeling nut ingredients doesn’t justify class action because not everyone has nut allergies
Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC, No. 23-cv-00099-RFL, 2025 WL 2644747 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2025) Fukaya, who is allergic to tree nuts, alleged that Daiso failed to properly label its pre-packaged food products as containing tree nuts on its English-language … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged consumer protection, false advertising, fda, preemption
Leave a comment
sending DMCA notices about uncopyrightable work might be willful blindness, or not
Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2025 WL 2551098, No. 8:23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) Previous discussion. I find this case interesting because of the underlying gadget, the Kitchen Cube, which has depressions on different sides corresponding to different standard … Continue reading
2021 statements, even if false, not plausibly connected to 2024 sales loss
Trilogy Federal, LLC v. CivitasDX LLC, No. 24-2713, No. 25-792, 2025 WL 2651240 (D.D.C. Sept. 16, 2025) Just looking at the false advertising-related aspects of a complicated dispute. The parties sought to sell things to the government, specifically the VA. … Continue reading
general competitor has Lanham Act standing even if it doesn’t compete in alleged false advertiser’s subcategory
Colorado Biolabs, Inc. v. Three Arrows Nutra, LLC, No. 3:25-CV-0601-D, 2025 WL 2524313 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2025) CBL sued Three Arrows for breach of a settlement agreement and related claims; Three Arrows counterclaimed along similar lines. The parties sell … Continue reading