Tag Archives: false advertising

negative inference about other juices from “no sugar added” on D’s juice is implausible

Posted on March 12, 2020 by rtushnet

Shaeffer v. Califia Farms, LLC, 44 Cal.App.5th 1125, No. B291085 (Feb. 6, 2020) Califia sells a “100% Tangerine Juice.” The front label includes “100% Tangerine Juice,” “No Sugar Added,” and “Never From Concentrate.” Shaeffer brought the usual California claims, alleging … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“complete” vitamin is plausibly deceptive where essential nutrients are lacking

Posted on March 10, 2020 by rtushnet

Devane v. Church & Dwight Co., No. 3:19-cv-09899-BRM-LHG, 2020 WL 998946 (D.N.J. Feb. 28, 2020) Plaintiffs brought consumer protection claims based on Church & Dwight’s purportedly false labelling of several multivitamins, including L’il Critters Multivitamins, Vitafusion Women’s Complete Multivitamins, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FDA/FTC Workshop on a Competitive Marketplace for Biosimilars

Posted on March 9, 2020 by rtushnet

FDA Licensure Process and U.S. Biosimilar Markets   [I entered in media res] · Eva Temkin, Acting Director for Policy, Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars,  CDER, FDA   · Christine Simmon, Executive Director, Biosimilars Council, AAM: barriers to entry for … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Cal. court says “controversial” claim is therefore not factual

Posted on March 3, 2020 by rtushnet

Serova v. Sony Music Entertainment, 44 Cal.App.5th 103 (2020) Hard to believe the reasoning in this case could get worse, but they may have achieved it. The California Supreme Court told the court of appeals to reconsider its earlier decision … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Even in default, damages must still be shown

Posted on February 18, 2020 by rtushnet

NITV Fed. Servs., LLC v. Dektor Corp., 2019 WL 7899731 No. 18-80994-Civ-Brannon (S.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2019) This is a default judgment, but it still has interesting bits. The parties compete to sell truth verification technology, which will become ironic. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Kids” in product name represents that product is safe for children to use

Posted on February 18, 2020 by rtushnet

Mirza v. Ignite USA, LLC, 2020 WL 704791, No. 19 C 5836 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 12, 2020) Ignite sells reusable beverage containers, coffee mugs, water bottles, and kids’ cups under the Contigo brand name. Plaintiffs bought Contigo Kids Cleanable Water … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

when you buy a business whose mark is the owner’s photo, make sure you get all the rights

Posted on February 15, 2020 by rtushnet

Minott v. Wichita Water Conditioning, Inc., No. 18-cv-01656-MSK-SKC, 2020 WL 616359 (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2020) Minott used to own Fluid, which operated a water conditioning business under the trade name Chuck, The Water Man. Fluid made extensive use of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Judge Alsup seems to think cosmetic mask claims are false

Posted on January 24, 2020 by rtushnet

Miller v. Peter Thomas Roth, LLC, 2020 WL 363045, No. C 19-00698 WHA (N.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2020) OK, he doesn’t say so outright, but wait for the bit about the in-court demonstration he expects. Defendants PTR Labs sell “specialty … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Malwarebytes: same result, new puzzles on remand for 230 immunity

Posted on January 6, 2020 by rtushnet

Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Malwarebytes, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2019 WL 7373959, No. 17-17351 (9th Cir. Dec. 31, 2019) New opinion, same result; no rehearing en banc. Because the parties are competitors, §230 does not provide Malwarebytes with … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

another timeshare exit company can be sued under state law, but not Lanham Act

Posted on January 6, 2020 by rtushnet

Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. v. Reed Hein & Assoc., LLC, 2019 WL 7423517, No: 6:17-cv-1542-Orl-78DCI (M.D. Fla. Oct. 4, 2019) Another timeshare case, this one kicking out Lanham Act claims but not FDUTPA deceptive practices claims on proximate cause. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment