-
Recent Posts
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
- Santa Clara IP conference: How It’s Going: What Went Wrong?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
sending DMCA notices about uncopyrightable work might be willful blindness, or not
Leszczynski v. Kitchen Cube LLC, 2025 WL 2551098, No. 8:23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2025) Previous discussion. I find this case interesting because of the underlying gadget, the Kitchen Cube, which has depressions on different sides corresponding to different standard … Continue reading
2021 statements, even if false, not plausibly connected to 2024 sales loss
Trilogy Federal, LLC v. CivitasDX LLC, No. 24-2713, No. 25-792, 2025 WL 2651240 (D.D.C. Sept. 16, 2025) Just looking at the false advertising-related aspects of a complicated dispute. The parties sought to sell things to the government, specifically the VA. … Continue reading
general competitor has Lanham Act standing even if it doesn’t compete in alleged false advertiser’s subcategory
Colorado Biolabs, Inc. v. Three Arrows Nutra, LLC, No. 3:25-CV-0601-D, 2025 WL 2524313 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 2, 2025) CBL sued Three Arrows for breach of a settlement agreement and related claims; Three Arrows counterclaimed along similar lines. The parties sell … Continue reading
3d Circuit affirmance shows that false advertising damages remain hard to prove
CareDX, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., 2025 WL 2480117, No. 23-2427, No. 23-2428 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2025) The court of appeals affirms the district court in this Lanham Act/coordinate Delaware state law case based on allegedly false claims Natera made … Continue reading
keyword ad claim fails out of the gate, but bad (c) claim not yet challenged
Regalo Int’l LLC v. Aborder Prods. Inc, 2025 WL 2483167, No. 3:24-CV-03270-E (N.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2025) Eric Goldman on the keyword ad aspects of this case about pet and baby gates. Regalo alleged that Aborder sold “knock-offs of Plaintiffs’ … Continue reading
9th Circuit finds laches in false advertising case
World Nutrition Inc. v. Advanced Supplementary Tech. Corp., 2025 WL 2427613, No. 24-4976 (9th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025) Over a partial dissent, the court of appeals reverses the district court’s refusal of a laches defense in this false advertising case, … Continue reading
literal falsity wasn’t enough without evidence of lost sales or harm to goodwill
G. W. Aru, LLC v. W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn., No. JKB-22-2636, 2025 WL 2402194 (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2025) Previous decision resolving some pretrial issues; this opinion comes after a bench trial, which resulted in a ruling for defendant … Continue reading
class certification partly granted in Tesla self-driving case
In Re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litig., No. 22-cv-05240-RFL, 2025 WL 2391446 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025) While not adopting all plaintiffs’ arguments, the court certifies a limited class to challenge Tesla’s full self-driving claims. I’m going to omit … Continue reading
drug company plausibly alleged confusion about partnership but not falsity of “same drug” claims about Canadian imports
AbbVie Inc. v. Payer Matrix, LLC, No. 23 CV 2836, 2025 WL 2374490 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 15, 2025) AbbVie sells the specialty drugs Humira, Skyrizi, and Rinvoq. Payer Matrix is “an alternative funding provider that works with self-funded health plans … Continue reading
court finds unique tracking of units of fluoride products immaterial even if vaguely safety-related
Method Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. H2-Pharma, LLC, 2025 WL 2298395, No. 2:20-cv-753-ECM (M.D. Ala. Aug. 8, 2025) Method asked the court to reconsider its ruling granting summary judgment on certain false advertising claims to H2, which sells a fluoride product as … Continue reading