Monthly Archives: March 2023

Panel on Jack Daniels argument at AU-WCL, March 22

 IP at the Supreme Court Series: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC March 22 | 5:00 – 6:30pm EDT | Hybrid | NT01 | Reception to FollowRegistration Required Moderated by Professor Christine Farley American University Washington College of Law regularly … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

two melatonin class actions alleging higher doses than needed survive

Mack v. Amazon.com, 2023 WL 2538706, No. C22-1310-JCC (W.D. Wash. Mar. 16, 2023) Plaintiffs alleged they bought and used Solimo, a melatonin supplement manufactured and sold by Amazon. Each product purports to provide a specific dose of melatonin per serving … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

claims to “take a beating,” “withstand,” and “increase durability” were puffery

Lowe v. ShieldMark, Inc., No. 1:19CV00748, 2023 WL 2540296 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 16, 2023) Lowe sued ShieldMark for (as relevant here) false advertising of its line floor tape. The court granted summary judgment because the accused statements were not falsifiable: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

trial court erred by presuming materiality of black box warning; $834 million penalty vacated

State ex rel. Shikada v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 2023 WL 2519857, SCAP-21-0000363, — P.3d —- (Hawai’i Mar. 15, 2023) The state sued two pharmaceutical companies for violating Hawai‘i’s Unfair or Deceptive Acts or Practices law (UDAP) by misleading the public … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

video on company’s YouTube channel was informational, not commercial speech

WatsonSeal Marketing LLC v. Crawlspace Ninja IP LLC, 2023 WL 2533061, No. 5:22-cv-649-LCB (N.D. Ala. Mar. 15, 2023) When is informational material related to a for-profit company’s business commercial speech? Here, the court finds a YouTube video noncommercial despite some … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

no disgorgement/fees in false advertising case even after Romag remand

Harbor Breeze Corp. v. Newport Landing Sportfishing, Inc., 2023 WL 2504988, No. SACV 17-01613-CJC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2023) Previous district court ruling on irreparable harm; previous 9th Cir. opinion remanding for reconsideration of disgorgement and attorneys’ fees after … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Transformative work of the day, SVB edition

from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2023/03/transformative-work-of-day-svb-edition.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

HLS teaching series: Developing Professionalism in Students, March 21, at 12 noon EST

Developing Professionalism in Students Register here: https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_W60Re3yDQRSfSPWgw0EP8Q Noon EST, March 21 What is professionalism for a lawyer? How can we as teachers help students develop professional identities in ways that honor their diversity and commitments? Norms of professionalism can be exclusionary, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

New paper: Bad Spaniels, Counterfeit Methodists, and Lying Birds: How Trademark Law Reinvented Strict Scrutiny

On SSRN, in advance of the JDI v. VIP case: Bad Spaniels, Counterfeit Methodists, and Lying Birds: How Trademark Law Reinvented Strict Scrutiny Abstract: Does trademark law cover noncommercial speech, defined as it is in First Amendment doctrine as speech … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

detailed examination of harm story dooms FedEx’s false advertising claim

Ah, how I wish courts would apply the same scrutiny to trademark harm stories. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. Route Consultant, Inc., 2023 WL 2466624, No. 3:22-cv-00656 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2023) FedEx uses around 4500 independent contractors (ISPs) … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment