Tag Archives: false advertising

7-11% oversupply of caffeine in energy drink wasn’t plausibly material

In Re: Prime Energy Consumer Litigation, No. 24 Civ. 2657 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2025) You can tell how this will go from the first sentence: “For those consumers seeking a jolt of energy in caffeinated-beverage form, does the inclusion … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Visual comparison in online contract formation

Cody v. Jill Acquisition LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1822907, No. 25-CV-937 TWR (KSC) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 30, 2025) I wouldn’t usually blog a consumer class action that was just about arbitration, but I want to highlight this one … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

resale is not a misrepresentation of being an authorized seller under false advertising law

FB Select, LLC v. Ocean Blue Trading, LLC, No. 24-cv-8425 (PKC), 2025 WL 2172653 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 31, 2025) Finding cases where TM and false advertising law give different outputs on the same facts because of lack of harm/materiality/falsity is my … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

court upholds nine-figure verdict in false advertising case

Guardant Health, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., 2025 WL 2106522, No. 21-cv-04062-EMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2025) Previous opinion discussed here. Guardant sued Natera for falsely advertising a clinical test; after the court denied a PI, it conducted a trial at … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

9th Circuit affirms class status based on materiality of claim in product name

Noohi v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., — F.4th —-, 2025 WL 2089582, No. 23-55190 (9th Cir. Jul. 25, 2025) J&J sells Neutrogena Oil-Free Face Moisturizer for Sensitive Skin. The district court certified a class in a consumer protection case … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

court finds advertising injury insurance coverage in false association case despite consumer fraud and other exclusions

Illinois Casualty Co. v. Kladek, Inc., No. 22-3214 (DWF/DJF), 2025 WL 2071043 (D. Minn. Jul. 23, 2025) ICC sought declaratory judgment that it didn’t have to defend (or indemnify) its insured in a Lanham Act false association lawsuit brought by … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

amicus in Prevagen v. FTC appeal

 Led by Truth in Advertising; I was happy to sign on. from Blogger http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2025/07/amicus-in-prevagen-v-ftc-appeal.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

alleged use of competitor’s corporate “persona” didn’t cause actionable confusion

SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Co., LLC, No. 2023-2426, 2025 WL 2057365 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 23, 2025) Discussion of previous district court opinion here. Because a patent is involved, the appeal on all issues goes to the Federal … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

XL BBL and Petite BBL are generic for what you think they’re generic for

Andre P. Marshall, M.D. Inc. v. Squlpt Management, LLC, 2025 WL 2025000, No. 2:24-cv-01784-SB-AS (C.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2025) The interesting false advertising component of this case doesn’t get resolved on summary judgment, but we do get a finding that … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

AI voice cloning opinion narrows claims to ROP, rejecting TM and (most) copyright theories

Lehrman v. Lovo, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2025 WL 1902547, 24-CV-3770 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 10, 2025) Plaintiffs alleged that Lovo misled them about its use of their voices, using AI to synthesize and sell unauthorized “clones” of their voices. They … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment