-
Recent Posts
- disgorgement can’t be a lottery windfall–even when D was engaged in illegal gambling
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- “ambiguity” is taking hold in consumer protection class actions, but it’s not the Lanham Act concept
- conducting dueling internet searches converts attys into fact witnesses in TM case
- Santa Clara IP Conference: Where Do We Go From Here?
Recent Comments
Archives
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Tag Archives: false advertising
“major flaw”/”tendency to shear” false advertising claims fail
Shepard & Assoc., Inc. v. Lokring Tech., LLC, 2023 WL 5229803, No. 1:20-cv-02488 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 15, 2023) Lokring sells fittings for pipes and other transfer systems for fluids and gases, as well as tools used to install them. Its … Continue reading
Zillow’s “agent” and “other” tabs were literally false where some agents ended up in “other” purgatory
REX – Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., 2023 WL 5334389, No. C21-0312 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Aug. 18, 2023) Zillow aggregates listings of real properties that are for sale or for rent. Before January 2021, Zillow’s websites displayed on … Continue reading
claims about legality of insurance service are falsifable
Route App, Inc. v. Heuberger, 2023 WL 5334192, No. 2:22-cv-00291-TS-JCB (D. Utah Aug. 18, 2023) (magistrate) Route is a package tracking company that provides shipping insurance to e-commerce merchants. Heuberger was a Route customer who then launched a competitor, Navidium. … Continue reading
state consumer protection law gives competitor plaintiff more leeway than Lanham Act, court holds
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Company, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4463246, No. 2:17-cv-00702-RJS-DAO (D. Utah Jul. 11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged defamation, false advertising, tortious interference, trademark
Leave a comment
AMG Capital didn’t change monetary remedies for civil contempt
Federal Trade Commission v. National Urological Group, Inc., 2023 WL 5541756 No. 21-14161, — F.4th —- (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2023) Nearly 20 years ago, the FTC sued appellants, alleging they had misrepresented their weight-loss products to consumers. The district … Continue reading
court certifies “C+Collagen” class even if consumers don’t know that all collagen is from animals
Gunaratna v. Dennis Gross Cosmetology LLC, No. CV 20-2311-MWF (GJSx), 2023 WL 5505052 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2023) Previously, the court denied a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim that “C + Collagen” was misleading because defendant’s product had no collagen. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
“Face” sunscreen 2x as expensive as regular plausibly misleading when formula was the same
Akes v. Beiersdorf, Inc., 2023 WL 5000434, No. 3:22-cv-869 (JBA) (D. Conn. Aug. 4, 2023) Akes brought the usual California claims/unjust enrichment, alleging that she was misled by the labeling of the 2.5-ounce bottle of Coppertone Sport Mineral sunscreen as … Continue reading
Paul Mitchell plausibly not “cruelty free” because of entry into market requiring animal testing
Heagney v. John Paul Mitchell Sys., 2023 WL 4947974, No. 23-cv-00687-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023) A smoothly written opinion: As the complaint tells it, Paul Mitchell has long marketed its business and its products as “cruelty-free.” The plaintiffs say … Continue reading
Hall v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 19cv1715-JO-AHG, 2023 WL 4417265, — F.R.D. – (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2023) Previous opinion in this case about allegedly deceptive/inadequately disclosed mandatory “resort fees.” The court ends up certifying an issues California class, but … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged class actions, consumer protection, false advertising
Leave a comment
IPSC Opening Plenary Session
Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Non expressive uses: … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 230, conferences, consumer protection, copyright, false advertising, first amendment, patents, trademark
Leave a comment