Tag Archives: false advertising

“major flaw”/”tendency to shear” false advertising claims fail

Shepard & Assoc., Inc. v. Lokring Tech., LLC, 2023 WL 5229803, No. 1:20-cv-02488 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 15, 2023) Lokring sells fittings for pipes and other transfer systems for fluids and gases, as well as tools used to install them. Its … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Zillow’s “agent” and “other” tabs were literally false where some agents ended up in “other” purgatory

REX – Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc., 2023 WL 5334389, No. C21-0312 TSZ (W.D. Wash. Aug. 18, 2023) Zillow aggregates listings of real properties that are for sale or for rent. Before January 2021, Zillow’s websites displayed on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

claims about legality of insurance service are falsifable

Route App, Inc. v. Heuberger, 2023 WL 5334192, No. 2:22-cv-00291-TS-JCB (D. Utah Aug. 18, 2023) (magistrate) Route is a package tracking company that provides shipping insurance to e-commerce merchants. Heuberger was a Route customer who then launched a competitor, Navidium. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

state consumer protection law gives competitor plaintiff more leeway than Lanham Act, court holds

SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. Seismic Bracing Company, LLC, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4463246, No. 2:17-cv-00702-RJS-DAO (D. Utah Jul. 11, 2023) The parties compete in the design of buckling-restrained braces, which are structural devices that help buildings withstand seismic … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

AMG Capital didn’t change monetary remedies for civil contempt

Federal Trade Commission v. National Urological Group, Inc., 2023 WL 5541756 No. 21-14161, — F.4th —- (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2023) Nearly 20 years ago, the FTC sued appellants, alleging they had misrepresented their weight-loss products to consumers. The district … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

court certifies “C+Collagen” class even if consumers don’t know that all collagen is from animals

Gunaratna v. Dennis Gross Cosmetology LLC, No. CV 20-2311-MWF (GJSx), 2023 WL 5505052 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2023) Previously, the court denied a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim that “C + Collagen” was misleading because defendant’s product had no collagen. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Face” sunscreen 2x as expensive as regular plausibly misleading when formula was the same

Akes v. Beiersdorf, Inc., 2023 WL 5000434, No. 3:22-cv-869 (JBA) (D. Conn. Aug. 4, 2023) Akes brought the usual California claims/unjust enrichment, alleging that she was misled by the labeling of the 2.5-ounce bottle of Coppertone Sport Mineral sunscreen as … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Paul Mitchell plausibly not “cruelty free” because of entry into market requiring animal testing

Heagney v. John Paul Mitchell Sys., 2023 WL 4947974, No. 23-cv-00687-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023) A smoothly written opinion: As the complaint tells it, Paul Mitchell has long marketed its business and its products as “cruelty-free.” The plaintiffs say … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Hall v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 19cv1715-JO-AHG, 2023 WL 4417265, — F.R.D. – (S.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2023) Previous opinion in this case about allegedly deceptive/inadequately disclosed mandatory “resort fees.” The court ends up certifying an issues California class, but … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

 Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Non expressive uses: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment