Category Archives: Uncategorized

Plaintiff fails to hit one out of the park with false advertising claim as substitute for TM

Parks, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 2015 WL 4545408, No. 5:15–cv–00946 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2015)   Parks sells sausage and other processed meats; its origin is in the H.G. Parks Sausage Company, known for the first African–American–owned company to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

No silver bullet for innovator in bullion market

Provident Precious Metals, LLC v. Northwest Territorial Mint, LLC, 2015 WL 4522923, No. 3:13–CV–02942 (N.D. Tex. July 27, 2015)   Interesting TM/copyright case that straddles the boundaries of so-called aesthetic and “utilitarian” functionality: is the accuracy of a replica product … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amicus supporting rehearing in MTM v. Amazon

IP Professors, with excellent assistance from Cathy Gellis. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1IbyIKz

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Limiting remedies when a descriptive fair use defense fails

Anhing Corp. v. Thuan Phong Co., No. CV 13-05167, 2015 WL 4517846  (C.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2015)    This post-trial ruling covers a lot of detailed ground on descriptive fair use, unclean hands, and remedies.  Anhing successfully sued Thuan Phong … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Transformative use of the day, Lululemon edition

I can’t wait to carry this bag around and watch the double-takes.  (Would also fit well on Welcome to Night Vale.) from Blogger http://ift.tt/1DbWObD

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Somehow the Coke bottle survived this dilutive free riding

1962 Doyle Dane Bernbach ad for the VW Beetle: Headline: 2 shapes known the world over. Text: Nobody really notices Coke bottles or Volkswagens any more. They’re so well known, they blend in with the scenery…. (The only reason you … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

4th Circuit denies rehearing in In re GNC

😦 If this ruling sticks and is actually applied in Lanham Act cases (something of which I am uncertain), then the resulting circuit split would probably justify Supreme Court review, given the Court’s newfound interest in 43(a)(1)(B). from Blogger http://ift.tt/1SguBHc

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ISHTIP at Penn, part 9

Session 6 | Josh Sarnoff (DePaul University), Moderator   In Search of a Trade Mark: Search practices and Bureaucratic Poetry Jose Bellido and Hyo Yoon Kang (University of Kent, UK) Commentator | Amanda Scardamaglia (Swinburne Law School)   Enhanced searching: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ISHTIP at Penn, part 8

Methodology: What should histories and theories of IP be doing? What role should interdisciplinarity play? | Martha Woodmansee (Case Western Reserve University), Moderator   Lionel Bently (Cambridge) We tolerated the use of the term “IP” to discuss the field, though … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ISHTIP at Penn, Part 7

Session 5 | Martin Fredriksson (Linköping University, Sweden), Moderator   Open Source Intelligence: Counterinsurgency, State Secrets, and Small Novels Joseph Slaughter (Columbia) Commentator | Catherine Bond (University of New South Wales)   Operation of IP in the context of torture, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment