-
Recent Posts
- weak infringement case + bad litigation conduct = fee shift for anticompetitive suit over descriptive term
- use of (R) on goods for which mark is not registered might be literally false
- Midjourney can’t force Disney to disclose the prompts it used that didn’t generate material in complaint
- Private label brands show lack of exclusive use for Pedialyte’s trade dress claim, but bad social media use saves TM claim
- 9th Circuit orders class decertified: common issues on materiality/damages insufficient without deception
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- June 2013
Categories
- 230
- acpa
- advertising
- antitrust
- art law
- attribution
- blogging
- california
- cfaa
- cfps
- class actions
- cmi
- comics
- commercial speech
- conferences
- consumer protection
- contracts
- copying
- copyright
- counterfeiting
- cultural property
- damages
- dastar
- defamation
- design patent
- dilution
- disclosures
- disparagement
- dmca
- drm
- fan fiction
- fanworks
- fda
- fees
- first amendment
- ftc
- geographic indications
- http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post
- insurance
- jurisdiction
- libraries
- misappropriation
- music
- my lawsuits
- my writings
- parody
- patent
- patents
- preemption
- presentations
- privacy
- procedure
- reading list
- remedies
- right of publicity
- secondary liability
- securities
- standing
- surveys
- teaching
- tortious interference
- trade secrets
- trademark
- traditional knowledge
- Uncategorized
- unconscionability
- unfairness
- warranties
Meta
Category Archives: Uncategorized
IPSC Breakout Session 4, Design, Trademark & IP Boundaries
Backdoor Trade Dress, Rachael Dickson Strange things are afoot at the PTO. Applications for line drawings of specific products. They are not configuration marks for the product design. They’re just design marks. In addition to the usual TM registration requirements, … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session 3 Trademark Confusion & Consumer Perception
Trademark Confusion as a Matter of Law, Andrew Michaels Is infringement a proposition about the world, or about the law? Fact: an empirical predictive question about the world. Law: a normative judgment about whether there should be legal responsibility—is the … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session 2 Copyright Fixation & Subject Matter
Culture Isn’t Transitory: The Disappearance of Music and Film Under the Copyright Regime Amanda M. Whorton & David S. Levine How could © improve cultural heritage preservation? Modestly change fixation to help archivists. We have only one video recording of … Continue reading
IPSC Breakout Session 1 Copyright Secondary Liability
Copyright’s Intent, Mark McKenna (with Laura A. Heymann & Alfred C. Yen) Cox: Contributory infringement for service providers can be shown only with intent, or with a service tailored to infringement. What happened to Gershwin? Will courts really accept that? … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 1201, 1202, conferences, copyright, secondary liability
Leave a comment
IPSC Opening Plenary Session: IP Openness, Secrecy, and Enclosure
Selective Exploitation, Kristelia García Justifications for deference to rightsholders in enforcement context are less persuasive than justifications for deference to rightsholders in exploitation decisions. These aren’t infringers—outside of ©’s standard infringement/remedies scope. Conduct at issue: shifting content from Peacock to … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged conferences, copyright, patent, trade secrets, trademark
Leave a comment
Reading list: Do Louis Vuitton’s Registered Trademarks in China Appropriate Traditional Chinese Culture?
Do Louis Vuitton’s Registered Trademarks in China Appropriate Traditional Chinese Culture? Ohio State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 980 20 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2026 Daniel C. K. Chow Michael E. Moritz College of Law Date Written: August 03, 2026 … Continue reading
10th Circuit finds that disparagement by pet food company was commercial speech though affiliated vets’/nonprofits’ speech wasn’t
KetoNatural Pet Foods, Inc. v. Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc., No. 24-3185 (10th Cir. Jul. 14, 2026) The court of appeals affirms in part and reverses in part the district court opinion dismissing Lanham Act claims against Hill’s and other defendants. … Continue reading
safety claims aren’t vague in context of child car seats
Ricardo Moncada v. Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc., — F.Supp.3d —-, 2026 WL 866852, No. 25-cv-2592 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2026) Nuna allegedly marketed its Rava-brand children’s car-seat product by emphasizing its safety features and a product-testing regimen that exceeded American … Continue reading
Under Armour defeats Lanham Act claim, must continue to fight tortious interference
Multiple Energy Technol., LLC v. Under Armour, Inc., 2026 WL 2016679, 2:20-CV-664 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 13, 2026) Bioceramic powder is “a substance that is integrated into clothing, and, when worn, allegedly improves sleep and muscle recovery.” Plaintiff MET made a … Continue reading
DDC won’t protect World Professional Association for Transgender Health against FTC/WD Tex
World Professional Association for Transgender Health v. Federal Trade Comm’n, No. 26-532 (JEB), 2026 WL 1999008 (D.D.C. Jul. 10, 2026) Some broader commentary on the regime’s mostly successful attempt to attack transgender care in Texas. A main promise of the … Continue reading