Tag Archives: false advertising

Entitlement to disgorgement doesn’t create Lanham Act standing

Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp., 2016 WL 2644890, NO. 5:13-CV-642 (E.D.N.C. May 9, 2016) Simple, but worth having a cite: plaintiff claimed false advertising based on allegedly false patent marking.  He couldn’t show that the falsity was proximately connected to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

There’s no cushioning this blow: Comparative advertising is copyright fair use

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. American Signature, Inc., 2014 WL 11320708, No. 11–cv–427 (S.D. Ohio June 25, 2014)   This 2014 case just showed up in my Westclip search and is worth noting for adding to the small but consistent … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Cal. court sensibly rejects Fourth Circuit’s GNC rule on consumer protection claims

Mullins v. Premier Nutrition Corp., 2016 WL 1534784, No. 13-cv-01271 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2016) This case revisits an issue with which courts have struggled: when consumer plaintiffs plead that a product advertised as clinically proven isn’t, is that a … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Minimal pleading of responsibility suffices to evade 230 dismissal

Congoo, LLC v. Revcontent LLC, 2016 WL 1547171, No. 16-401 (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2016)   The parties compete in the market for native advertising.  Congoo alleged that Revcontent caused false/misleading native advertising to be published.  Revcontent asserted §230 immunity.  The … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Something smells: new product makes competitor’s claims instantly literally false

Playtex Prods., LLC v. Munchkin, Inc., 2016 WL 1276450, No. 14-cv-1308 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2016)   Playtex makes a diaper pail, the Diaper Genie, with three current varieties: Diaper Genie Elite, Diaper Genie Essentials, and Diaper Genie Mini. Soiled diapers … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Anonymous defamatory posts are “advertising or promotion” under Lanham Act

Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. Assara I LLC, 2016 WL 815205, No. 8-cv-0442 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2016)   R&J sued Assara and a number of related people eight years ago.  The parties compete to offer laser hair … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Fraud claim by NY AG against Donald Trump revived on appeal

People ex rel. Schneiderman v. Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC, — N.Y.S.3d —-, 2016 WL 783216, 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 01430 (Sup. Ct. Mar. 1, 2016)   Snarky political note: It doesn’t appear that Trump could object to this ruling on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Hidden connections between doctors and the drugs they promote

The violations of the FTC Endorsement Guidelines seem very clear in the stories recounted by this Boston Globe investigation.  H/T ST. from Blogger http://ift.tt/1UyHnQD

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ingredient supplier has standing to challenge supplement claims

Obesity Research Institute, LLC v. Fiber Research International, LLC, 2016 WL 739796,  No. 15-cv-00595 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2016)   Fiber Research alleged that Obesity Research made claims for its weight loss product, Lipozene, touting clinical testing supporting the role … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Advertising law at Cardozo

Cardozo Law Conference: New Impressions of Advertising Law   Panel 1: False Advertising (herein of Pom Wonderful v. FTC) Moderator: Brett Frischmann | Professor and Director, Cardozo Intellectual Property & Information Law Program, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law   … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment