Tag Archives: false advertising

Volunteer moderator plausibly alleged to be agent of ISP for 230 purposes

Posted on July 13, 2016 by rtushnet

Enigma Software Gp. USA LLC v. Bleeping Computer LLC, 16 CV 57 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2016) Eric Goldman probably won’t like this decision holding that a volunteer moderator may be treated as the ISP’s agent when the ISP gives enough … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Allegations of undisclosed sponsorship defeat anti-SLAPP motion at pleading stage

Posted on June 27, 2016 by rtushnet

Woodard v. Labrada, 2016 WL 3436434, No. 16-00189 (C.D. Cal. May 12, 2016) Woodard brought a putative class action alleging that various defendants (Media Defendants) misrepresented the weight loss benefits of weight loss supplement products made by the Manufacturing Defendants. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

class action complaint survives GNC in 4th Cir. by pleading misleadingness

Posted on June 24, 2016 by rtushnet

Midwestern Midget Football Club Inc. v. Riddell, Inc., 2016 WL 3406129, No. 2:15-00244 (S.D. W. Va. Jun. 17, 2016) Midwestern is a nonprofit youth football organization, and Riddell makes helmets for football players.  Midwestern bought 12-24 Riddell Revolution Helmets per … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Certification nonprofit engaged in commercial speech when it badmouthed uncertified seller

Posted on June 20, 2016 by rtushnet

Handsome Brook Farm, LLC v. Humane Farm Animal Care, Inc., 2016 WL 3348431, No. 16-cv-592 (E.D. Va. Jun. 15, 2016)   Nice thorough opinion playing out the interaction between Lexmark and the definition of “commercial advertising or promotion.”  The USDA … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Amicus in Lanham Act/commercial speech case

Posted on May 31, 2016 by rtushnet

Mark McKenna just filed this brief on behalf of law professors, including me, supporting a simple resolution of Tobinick v. Novella, which should be an easy case (and in easy cases it may be tempting to sweep too broadly). from … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Deception Roundtable, part 2

Posted on May 20, 2016 by rtushnet

Session 2 – Privacy and Technology Discussion Leaders: Ryan Calo, Aaron Perzanowski, Woody Hartzog, Danielle Citron   Matwyshyn: attempts to create commonality/familiarity w/consumer—good feeling.  Can also be a part of having ads be artistic expression.   Ryan Calo: important role … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Notre Dame Deception Roundtable, part 1

Posted on May 20, 2016 by rtushnet

Deception Roundtable Notre Dame Law School, Chicago   Session 1 – Advertising and Trademark Discussion Leaders: Bill McGeveran, Mark McKenna, Zahr Said   Mark McKenna: deception comes up in many fields, but people aren’t talking to each other/citing each other … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Entitlement to disgorgement doesn’t create Lanham Act standing

Posted on May 12, 2016 by rtushnet

Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp., 2016 WL 2644890, NO. 5:13-CV-642 (E.D.N.C. May 9, 2016) Simple, but worth having a cite: plaintiff claimed false advertising based on allegedly false patent marking.  He couldn’t show that the falsity was proximately connected to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

There’s no cushioning this blow: Comparative advertising is copyright fair use

Posted on May 11, 2016 by rtushnet

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. American Signature, Inc., 2014 WL 11320708, No. 11–cv–427 (S.D. Ohio June 25, 2014)   This 2014 case just showed up in my Westclip search and is worth noting for adding to the small but consistent … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Cal. court sensibly rejects Fourth Circuit’s GNC rule on consumer protection claims

Posted on April 22, 2016 by rtushnet

Mullins v. Premier Nutrition Corp., 2016 WL 1534784, No. 13-cv-01271 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2016) This case revisits an issue with which courts have struggled: when consumer plaintiffs plead that a product advertised as clinically proven isn’t, is that a … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment